Cited by 160Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesHistory of Science and MedicineMedical History and Innovations

A ship upon a stormy sea: The medicalization of pregnancy

Barker, K.K·1998·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

This is an empirical illustration of the role of biomedical rhetoric in the rise of medicine's cultural authority. Using the case of pregnancy in the United States I delineate how biomedical rhetoric was key in the historical process of medicalization. The first systematic attempt to introduce women to a medical interpretation of pregnancy was the public health campaign of the United States Children's Bureau in the early twentieth century. A cornerstone of the Children's Bureau campaign was its publication "Prenatal Care," first published in 1913 and distributed to well over twenty-two million women by the mid-thirties. Prenatal Care represents the biomedical interpretation of pregnancy as it was first introduced to women. Through an analysis of this document I demonstrate the discursive mechanisms through which biomedicine reconceptualized pregnancy as medically problematic rather than as experientially and organically demanding. Prenatal Care demonstrates the ways in which the "universal" claims of biomedicine can advance a particular class and racial/ethnic composite of woman.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00155-5

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women's natural reproductive functions (e.g., pregnancy, childbirth, menstruation) are routinely medicalized.

    “Over the years, sociologists have shown that women's natural reproductive functions (e.g., pregnancy, childbirth, menstruation) are routinely medicalized (Barker 1998; Riessman 1983; Riska 2003).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barker, K. K.
Affiliations
Linfield College (US)
Corresponding author
Barker, K.K
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-10
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
1067-1076
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974600314
Cited by
160
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
54.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Innovations
Keywords
medicalization of pregnancy, Children's Bureau, prenatal care, public health campaigns, medical authority, discursive mechanisms, women's health, history of medicine, early 20th century
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Medicine, Philosophy, Medical, Physicians, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review