The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The impact of public spending on health: does money matter?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Björkman, M., & Svensson, J. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.735 · Cited by 739
“This can be compared to the numbers reported by Filmer and Pritchett (1999).”
Does progress towards universal health coverage improve population health?
Moreno-Serra, R., & Smith, P. C. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61039-3 · Cited by 636
Access to health care in developing countries: breaking down demand side barriers
O'Donnell, O. (2007) · Cadernos de Saúde Pública · doi:10.1590/s0102-311x2007001200003 · Cited by 567
Colonialism and development: A comparative analysis of Spanish and British colonies
Lange, M., Mahoney, J., & vom Hau, M. (2006) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/499510 · Cited by 471
HAS DEMOCRATIZATION REDUCED INFANT MORTALITY IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA? EVIDENCE FROM MICRO DATA
Kudamatsu, M. (2012) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01092.x · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1309-1323
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012024804
- Cited by
- 788
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of public spending on health: does money matter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00150-1
- The paper
- Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. (1999). The impact of public spending on health: does money matter? Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00150-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
