Cited by 739Global Maternal and Child HealthHealthcare Systems and ReformsPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Power to the People: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment on Community-Based Monitoring in Uganda*

Björkman, Martina, Svensson, Jakob·2009·Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

This paper presents a randomized field experiment on community-based monitoring of public primary health care providers in Uganda. Through two rounds of village meetings, localized nongovernmental organizations encouraged communities to be more involved with the state of health service provision and strengthened their capacity to hold their local health providers to account for performance. A year after the intervention, treatment communities are more involved in monitoring the provider, and the health workers appear to exert higher effort to serve the community. We document large increases in utilization and improved health outcomes—reduced child mortality and increased child weight—that compare favorably to some of the more successful community-based intervention trials reported in the medical literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.735

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interventions might also have indirect effects such as improved public integrity, improved quality or quantity of specific public services.

    “We are aware that, besides more direct impacts such as the reduction in the level of specific forms of corruption, interventions might also have indirect effects such as improved public integrity, improved quality or quantity of specific public services (Banerjee et al., 2010; Björkman & Svensson, 2009).”

    From Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Björkman & Svensson, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

15 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Björkman, M., & Svensson, J.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Economic Policy Research (GB)
  • Center for Economic and Policy Research (US)
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2009-05
Volume
124
Issue
2
Pages
735-769
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W3123010330
Cited by
739
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 36
FWCI
26.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Keywords
community-based monitoring, primary care, community participation, village meetings, non-governmental organizations, health care utilization, child mortality, child weight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review