Cited by 91Fatty Acid Research and HealthCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentAgricultural safety and regulations

A review of the safety of DHA45-oil

Kroes, Robert, Schaefer, Ernst J., Squire, Robert A., Williams, Gary M.·2003·Food and Chemical Toxicology

Abstract

Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), such as docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), are natural constituents of the human diet; however, dietary intakes of these fatty acids are below recommended values. The main dietary source of DHA is fatty fish, with lesser amounts provided by shellfish, marine mammals, and organ meats. The addition to traditional food products of refined oils produced by marine microalgae represents potential sources of supplemental dietary DHA. DHA45-oil is manufactured through a multi-step fermentation and refining process using a non-toxigenic and non-pathogenic marine protist. Comprising approximately 45% DHA, and lesser concentrations of palmitic acid and docosapentaenoic acid, DHA45-oil is intended for use in foods as a dietary source of DHA. The safety of DHA45-oil was evaluated in various genotoxicity and acute, subchronic, and reproductive toxicity studies. DHA45-oil produced negative results in genotoxicity assays and demonstrated a low acute oral toxicity in mice and rats. Dietary administration of DHA45-oil to rats in subchronic and one-generation reproductive studies produced results consistent with those observed in oral studies using high concentrations of omega-3 PUFAs from fish or other microalgal-derived oils. The results of these studies, as well as those of various published metabolic, toxicological, and clinical studies with DHA-containing oils, support the safety of DHA45-oil as a potential dietary source of DHA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0278-6915(03)00163-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DHA is an important structural fatty acid for correct brain and eye development in infants and supports cardiovascular health in adults.

    “DHA is an important structural fatty acid for correct brain and eye development in infants and has been shown to support cardiovascular health in adults (Kroes et al., 2003, Ward and Singh, 2005).”

    From Microalgae Metabolites: A Rich Source for Food and Medicine (2019) · cites this paper as Kroes et al., 2003

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 111 · Cited by 91

Authors
Kroes, R., Schaefer, E. J., Squire, R. A., & Williams, G. M.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • New York Medical College (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Gary M.
Venue
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
41
Issue
11
Pages
1433-1446
ISSN
0278-6915 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986667115
Cited by
91
References
111
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food and Chemical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
Keywords
docosahexaenoic acid, polyunsaturated fatty acids, omega-3 fatty acids, food safety, genotoxicity, acute oral toxicity, reproductive toxicity, subchronic toxicity, docosapentaenoic acid, palmitic acid
MeSH terms
Animals, Docosahexaenoic Acids, Food Analysis, Humans, Mutagens, Reproduction, Triglycerides, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review