Cited by 126Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineNerve injury and regeneration

Implantable bioelectronic interfaces for lost nerve functions

Heiduschka, P, Thanos, S·1998·Progress in Neurobiology

Abstract

Neuronal cells are unique within the organism. In addition to forming long-distance connections with other nerve cells and non-neuronal targets, they lose the ability to regenerate their neurites and to divide during maturation. Consequently, external violations like trauma or disease frequently lead to their disappearance and replacement by non-neuronal, and thus not properly functioning cells. The advent of microtechnology and construction of artificial implants prompted to create particular devices for specialised regions of the nervous system, in order to compensate for the loss of function. The scope of the present work is to review the current devices in connection with their applicability and functional perspectives. (1) Successful implants like the cochlea implant and peripherally implantable stimulators are discussed. (2) Less developed and not yet applicable devices like retinal or cortical implants are introduced, with particular emphasis given to the reasons for their failure to replace very complex functions like vision. (3) Material research is presented both from the technological aspect and from their biocompatibility as prerequisite of any implantation. (4) Finally, basic studies are presented, which deal with methods of shaping the implants, procedures of testing biocompatibility and modification of improving the interfaces between a technical device and the biological environment. The review ends by pointing to future perspectives in neuroimplantation and r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00013-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Platinum, iridium, tungsten, and stainless steel are typically used as conductors, and silicone elastomer, polytetrafluoroethylene, and polyimide as insulating carriers in neural electrodes.

    “Materials typically used are platinum, iridium, tungsten, and stainless steel as conductors and silicone elastomer, polytetrafluoroethylene, and polyimide as insulating carriers (Naples et al., 1990; Heiduschka and Thanos, 1998)”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 277 · Cited by 126

Authors
Heiduschka, P., & Thanos, S.
Affiliations
University Hospital Münster (DE)
Corresponding author
Thanos, S
Venue
Progress in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-08
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
433-461
ISSN
0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147732872
Cited by
126
References
277
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
neuroprosthetics, neural implants, bioelectronic interfaces, nerve regeneration, cochlear implants, peripheral nerve stimulation, retinal prosthesis, cortical implants, biocompatibility, implant materials, neural interfaces
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Biocompatible Materials, Cochlear Implants, Electrodes, Implanted, Electronics, Medical, Eye, Artificial, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Nerve Regeneration, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review