Cited by 43Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsWater Quality and Pollution AssessmentHydrology and Watershed Management Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ecological modelling of nitrate pollution in small river basins by spreadsheets and GIS

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3800(03)00232-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Arheimer, 2000, Watershed modelling of nonpoint nitrogen losses from arable land to the Swedish coast in 1985 and 1994, Ecol. Eng., 14, 389, 10.1016/S0925-8574(99)00063-4 · DOI
  2. Battin, A., Kinerson, R., Lahlou, M., 1998. EPA’s better assessment science integrating point and nonpoint sources (BASINS)—a powerful tool for managing watersheds. In: Proceedings of the 18th ESRI International Annual User Conference.
  3. Birkinshaw, 2000, Modelling nitrate transport in the Slapton Wood catchment using SHETRAN, J. Hydrol., 230, 18, 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00173-6 · DOI
  4. Burrough, P.A., McDonnell, R.A., 1998. Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  5. Florinsky, 2000, Relationships between topographically expressed zones of flow accumulation and sites of fault intersection: analysis by means of digital terrain modelling, Environ. Model. Software, 15, 87, 10.1016/S1364-8152(99)00025-0 · DOI
  6. Grimvall, 2000, Time scales of nutrient losses from land to sea—a European perspective, Ecol. Eng., 14, 363, 10.1016/S0925-8574(99)00061-0 · DOI
  7. Hannon, B., Ruth, M., 1994. Dynamic Modeling. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 50–60. · DOI
  8. Hession, 2000, Statewide non-point-source pollution assessment methodology, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 126, 146, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2000)126:3(146) · DOI
  9. Jørgensen, S.E., 1994. Fundamentals of Ecological Modelling, 2nd ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  10. Karssenberg, D., 2002. Building dynamic spatial environmental models. Doctors dissertation, Utrecht University, http://www.geog.uu.nl/pcraster/pcraster.html. · DOI
  11. Krysanova, 2000, Integrated modelling of hydrological processes and nutrient dynamics at the river basin scale, Hydrobiologia, 410, 131, 10.1023/A:1003728419934 · DOI
  12. Matějı́ček, 1997, Spatio-temporal modelling with ACSL in the GIS, Environmentalica, 11, 55
  13. Matějı́ček, L., 2002b. Ecological modelling using the spreadsheet model TabSim. In: Rizzoli, A.E., Kakeman, A.J. (Ed.), Integrated Assessment and Decision Support. Proceedings of the 1st Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modellling and Software Society, iEMSs, Lugano, pp. 354–359.
  14. Matějı́ček, L., Benešová, L., Tonika, J., 2000. Auswertung der Wasserqualität mit hilfe eines GIS. 9. Magdeburg Gewässerschutzseminar Einzugsgebietsmanagement, pp. 117–119.
  15. Matějı́ček, L., Benešová, L., Tonika, J., 2002a. Environmental modelling in urban areas with GIS. In: Rizzoli, A.E., Kakeman, A.J. (Eds.), Integrated Assessment and Decision Support. Proceedings of the 1st Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modellling and Software Society, iEMSs, Lugano, pp. 60–65.
  16. Moore, I.D., 1996. Hydrologic modeling and GIS. In: Goodchild, M.F. (Eds.), GIS and Environmental Modeling: Progress and Research Issuses. GIS World, Inc., pp. 143–148.
  17. Norton, 2000, The effects of forest on stream water quality in two coastal plain watersheds of the Chesapeake Bay, Ecol. Eng., 14, 337, 10.1016/S0925-8574(99)00060-9 · DOI
  18. Prakash, 2000, The use of remote sensing and GIS in watershed level analyses of non-point source pollution problems, For. Ecol. Manage., 128, 65, 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00273-X · DOI
  19. Rosenthal, 1999, Hydrologic modelings/GIS as an aid in locating monitoring sites, Trans. ASAE, 42, 1591, 10.13031/2013.13324 · DOI
  20. Sample, V.A. (Ed.), 1994. Remote Sensing and GIS in Ecosystem Management. Island Press, Washington.
  21. Spanou, 2000, An object-oriented tool for the control of point-source pollution in river systems, Environ. Model. Software, 15, 35, 10.1016/S1364-8152(99)00021-3 · DOI
  22. Sturman, 2000, Applied climatology, Progr. Phys. Geogr., 24, 129, 10.1177/030913330002400109 · DOI
  23. Su, 2000, Remote sensing of land use and vegetation for mesoscale hydrological studies, Int. J. Rem. Sens., 21, 213, 10.1080/014311600210803 · DOI
  24. Viovy, 2000, Automatic classification of time series (ACTS): a new clustering method for remote sensing time series, J. Rem. Sens., 21, 1537, 10.1080/014311600210308 · DOI
  25. Wesseling, C.G., Karssenberg, D.J., Burrough, P.A., Deursen, W.P.A., 1996. Integrating dynamic environmental models in GIS: the development of a dynamic modelling language. Trans. GIS 40–48. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 43

Metadata

Authors
Matějı́ček, L., Benešová, L., & Tonika, J.
Affiliations
Charles University (CZ)
Corresponding author
Matějı́ček, Luboš
Venue
Ecological Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12
Volume
170
Issue
2-3
Pages
245-263
ISSN
0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985229739
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecological Modelling (publishedVersion)
Funders
Univerzita Karlova v Praze
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Keywords
nitrate contamination, small river basins, compartmental modeling, surface water quality, land cover, nutrient sinks, point and non-point sources, remote sensing, Landsat 7, forest cover, agricultural land, urban environment, water quality management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review