The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Feeling vibrations: enhanced tactile sensitivity in congenitally deaf humans
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cross-modal plasticity: where and how?
Bavelier, D., & Neville, H. J. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn848 · Cited by 1,040
Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change
Merabet, L. B., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2758 · Cited by 751
Do deaf individuals see better?
Bavelier, D., Dye, M. W. G., & Hauser, P. C. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.006 · Cited by 506
The role of visual experience for the neural basis of spatial cognition
Pasqualotto, A., & Proulx, M. J. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.01.008 · Cited by 192
Hands help hearing: Facilitatory audiotactile interaction at low sound-intensity levels
Schürmann, M., Caetano, G., Jousmäki, V., & Hari, R. (2004) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1639909 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Levänen, S., & Hamdorf, D.
- Venue
- Neuroscience Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 301
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-77
- ISSN
- 0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978361468
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feeling vibrations: enhanced tactile sensitivity in congenitally deaf humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3940(01)01597-x
- The paper
- Levänen, S., & Hamdorf, D. (2001). Feeling vibrations: enhanced tactile sensitivity in congenitally deaf humans. Neuroscience Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3940(01)01597-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
