Cited by 751Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change

Open access
Merabet, Lotfi B., Pascual-Leone, Alvaro·2010·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

There is growing evidence that sensory deprivation is associated with crossmodal neuroplastic changes in the brain. After visual or auditory deprivation, brain areas that are normally associated with the lost sense are recruited by spared sensory modalities. These changes underlie adaptive and compensatory behaviours in blind and deaf individuals. Although there are differences between these populations owing to the nature of the deprived sensory modality, there seem to be common principles regarding how the brain copes with sensory loss and the factors that influence neuroplastic changes. Here, we discuss crossmodal neuroplasticity with regards to behavioural adaptation after sensory deprivation and highlight the possibility of maladaptive consequences within the context of rehabilitation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn2758

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Available evidence suggests that there is great potential in sensory substitution methods.

    “Notably, although the available evidence suggests that there is great potential in sensory substitution methods (see Bach-y-Rita & Kercel, 2003; Merabet & Pascual-Leone, 2010; Proulx et al., 2016; Shull & Damian, 2015; Nagel et al., 2005, for reviews)”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Merabet & Pascual-Leone, 2010

    In “The case of blindness” (page unavailable), the review describes visual-to-tactile and visual-to-auditory sensory substitution devices and evidence that their use recruits visual cortical areas. Its “Conclusions and the implications for rehabilitation” calls for strategies that leverage cross-modal interactions, but it does not specifically assess sensory substitution methods as having great potential. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Visual deprivation is associated with complex neuroplastic changes with respect to spatial hearing performance.

    “In sum, visual deprivation is associated with complex neuroplastic changes with respect to spatial hearing performance.”
  • Large literature suggests increased neuroplasticity in the context of visual sensory deprivation.

    “This is because of the large literature suggesting increased neuroplasticity in the context of visual sensory deprivation [1–8]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Myklebust HR Brutten M A study of the visual perception of deaf children Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1953 105 1 126 13040006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merabet, L. B., & Pascual-Leone, A.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Merabet, Lotfi B.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2009-11-25
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
44-52
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2002644089
Cited by
751
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 34
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (K23EY016131, R01EY019924)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Keywords
sensory deprivation, blindness, deafness, visual deprivation, auditory deprivation, brain reorganization, sensory impairment, rehabilitation, behavioral adaptation, maladaptive plasticity
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Afferent Pathways, Animals, Brain, Critical Period, Psychological, Humans, Models, Biological, Neuronal Plasticity, Sensory Deprivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review