Differences in the effects of zolpidem and diazepam on recurrent inhibition and long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal slices
Abstract
We used the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices to compare the effects of non-benzodiazepine zolpidem, which binds preferentially to the omega1 sites of gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABA(A)) receptors, and of benzodiazepine diazepam, which binds equipotently to the omega1 and omega2 sites, on the hippocampal inhibitory mechanism and on long-term potentiation (LTP), a possible cellular mechanism for memory. First, 1 microM diazepam had an enhancing effect on recurrent inhibition by alveus stimulation of orthodromically-induced population spikes, but 1 microM zolpidem had no significant effect. Second, 1 microM diazepam blocked LTP induction of the population spikes, whereas 1 microM zolpidem had no such effect. Only at a higher concentration of 10 microM, zolpidem had a significant effect on recurrent inhibition and LTP. These findings suggest that only the omega2 sites are mainly involved in modulation of the hippocampal inhibitory mechanism and LTP, and that the low affinity of zolpidem for the omega2 sites may account for less memory impairment caused by zolpidem than by benzodiazepines.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GABAergic agonists like benzodiazepines impair LTP and LTP-related plasticity in glutamatergic synapses via activation of GABA A receptor.
“GABAergic agonists, like benzodiazepines that are also used clinically to improve sleep, were consistently revealed to impair LTP as well as LTP-related plasticity in glutamatergic synapses via activation of the ionotropic GABA A receptor (e.g., Refs. 225, 277, 549, 575, 633, 1008Refs. 225, 277, 549, 575, 633, , 1270)).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [549]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rasch, B., & Born, J. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00032.2012 · Cited by 2,783 · see citing works
van Rijnsoever, C., Täuber, M., Choulli, M. K., Keist, R., Rudolph, U., Mohler, H., Fritschy, J. M., & Crestani, F. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1067-04.2004 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
The Non-Benzodiazepine Hypnotic Zolpidem Impairs Sleep-Dependent Cortical Plasticity
(2008) · Sleep · doi:10.5665/sleep/31.10.1381 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Higashima, M., Kinoshita, H., & Koshino, Y.
- Affiliations
- Kanazawa University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Higashima, Masato
- Venue
- Neuroscience Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 245
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 77-80
- ISSN
- 0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055971384
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- zolpidem, diazepam, GABAA receptor, long-term potentiation, recurrent inhibition, hippocampal CA1, population spike, memory impairment, non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, benzodiazepines
- MeSH terms
- Zolpidem, Animals, Diazepam, Electric Stimulation, Hippocampus, Male, Neural Inhibition, Pyridines, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Long-Term Potentiation, Rats, GABA-A Receptor Antagonists, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review