Cited by 25Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Differences in the effects of zolpidem and diazepam on recurrent inhibition and long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal slices

Higashima, Masato, Kinoshita, Hiroya, Koshino, Yoshifumi·1998·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

We used the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices to compare the effects of non-benzodiazepine zolpidem, which binds preferentially to the omega1 sites of gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABA(A)) receptors, and of benzodiazepine diazepam, which binds equipotently to the omega1 and omega2 sites, on the hippocampal inhibitory mechanism and on long-term potentiation (LTP), a possible cellular mechanism for memory. First, 1 microM diazepam had an enhancing effect on recurrent inhibition by alveus stimulation of orthodromically-induced population spikes, but 1 microM zolpidem had no significant effect. Second, 1 microM diazepam blocked LTP induction of the population spikes, whereas 1 microM zolpidem had no such effect. Only at a higher concentration of 10 microM, zolpidem had a significant effect on recurrent inhibition and LTP. These findings suggest that only the omega2 sites are mainly involved in modulation of the hippocampal inhibitory mechanism and LTP, and that the low affinity of zolpidem for the omega2 sites may account for less memory impairment caused by zolpidem than by benzodiazepines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3940(98)00178-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GABAergic agonists like benzodiazepines impair LTP and LTP-related plasticity in glutamatergic synapses via activation of GABA A receptor.

    “GABAergic agonists, like benzodiazepines that are also used clinically to improve sleep, were consistently revealed to impair LTP as well as LTP-related plasticity in glutamatergic synapses via activation of the ionotropic GABA A receptor (e.g., Refs. 225, 277, 549, 575, 633, 1008Refs. 225, 277, 549, 575, 633, , 1270)).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [549]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Higashima, M., Kinoshita, H., & Koshino, Y.
Affiliations
Kanazawa University (JP)
Corresponding author
Higashima, Masato
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-04
Volume
245
Issue
2
Pages
77-80
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055971384
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
zolpidem, diazepam, GABAA receptor, long-term potentiation, recurrent inhibition, hippocampal CA1, population spike, memory impairment, non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, benzodiazepines
MeSH terms
Zolpidem, Animals, Diazepam, Electric Stimulation, Hippocampus, Male, Neural Inhibition, Pyridines, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Long-Term Potentiation, Rats, GABA-A Receptor Antagonists, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review