The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study
Open accessAbstract
Phantom pain in subjects with an amputated limb is a well-known problem. However, estimates of the prevalence of phantom pain differ considerably in the literature. Various factors associated with phantom pain have been described including pain before the amputation, gender, dominance, and time elapsed since the amputation. The purposes of this study were to determine prevalence and factors associated with phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees in The Netherlands. Additionally, the relationship between phantom pain, phantom sensations and prosthesis use in upper limb amputees was investigated. One hundred twenty-four upper limb amputees participated in this study. Subjects were asked to fill out a self-developed questionnaire scoring the following items: date, side, level, and reason of amputation, duration of experienced pain before amputation, frequencies with which phantom sensations, phantom pain, and stump pain are experienced, amount of trouble and suffering experienced, respectively, related to these sensations, type of phantom sensations, medical treatment received for phantom pain and/or stump pain, and the effects of the treatment, self medication, and prosthesis use. The response rate was 80%. The prevalence of phantom pain was 51%, of phantom sensations 76% and of stump pain 49%; 48% of the subjects experienced phantom pain a few times per day or more; 64% experienced moderate to very much suffering from the phantom pain. A significant association was found between phantom pain and phantom sensations (relative risk 11.3) and between phantom pain and stump pain (relative risk 1.9). No other factors associated with phantom pain or phantom sensations could be determined. Only four patients received medical treatment for their phantom pain. Phantom pain is a common problem in upper limb amputees that causes considerable suffering for the subjects involved. Only a minority of subjects are treated for phantom pain. Further research is needed to determine factors associated with phantom pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Melzack, R. (1992) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0492-120 · Cited by 268
Cited by
Chapman, C. R., & Vierck, C. J. (2017) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2016.11.004 · Cited by 423
Epidemiology and treatment of neuropathic pain: The UK primary care perspective
Hall, G. C., Carroll, D., Parry, D., & McQuay, H. J. (2006) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.01.030 · Cited by 379
Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation
Raichle, K. A. (2008) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2007.09.0151 · Cited by 288
BONE, M., CRITCHLEY, P., & BUGGY, D. (2002) · Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine · doi:10.1053/rapm.2002.35169 · Cited by 274
Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: systematic literature review
Carey, S. L., Lura, D. J., Highsmith, M. J., CP, & FAAOP (2015) · Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2014.08.0192 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Kooijman, C. M., Dijkstra, P. U., Geertzen, J. H. B., Elzinga, A., & van der Schans, C. P.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-41
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985032510
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00264-5
- The paper
- Kooijman, C. M., Dijkstra, P. U., Geertzen, J. H. B., Elzinga, A., & van der Schans, C. P. (2000). Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00264-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.