The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gabapentin in postamputation phantom limb pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Severe phantom limb pain after surgical amputation affects 50% to 67% of patients and is difficult to treat. Gabapentin is effective in several syndromes of neuropathic pain. Therefore, we evaluated its analgesic efficacy in phantom limb pain. METHODS: Patients attending a multidisciplinary pain clinic with phantom limb pain were enrolled into this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Other anticonvulsant therapy was discontinued. Each treatment was 6 weeks separated by a 1-week washout period. Codeine/paracetamol was allowed as rescue analgesia. The daily dose of gabapentin was titrated in increments of 300 mg to 2400 mg or the maximum tolerated dose. Patients were assessed at weekly intervals. The primary outcome measure was visual analog scale (VAS) pain intensity difference (PID) compared with baseline at the end of each treatment. Secondary measures were indices of sleep interference, depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression [HAD] scale), and activities of daily living (Bartel Index). RESULTS: Nineteen eligible patients (mean age, 56 years; range, 24 to 68 years; 16 men) were randomized, of whom 14 completed both arms of the study. Both placebo and gabapentin treatments resulted in reduced VAS scores compared with baseline. PID was significantly greater than placebo for gabapentin therapy at the end of the treatment (3.2 +/- 2.1 v 1.6 +/- 0.7, P =.03). There were no significant differences between placebo and gabapentin therapy in terms of the number of tablets of rescue medication required, sleep interference, HAD scale, or Bartel Index. The medication was well tolerated with few reports of adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: After 6 weeks, gabapentin monotherapy was better than placebo in relieving postamputation phantom limb pain. There were no significant differences in mood, sleep interference, or activities of daily living, but a type II error cannot be excluded for these variables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Backonja, M. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.21.1831 · Cited by 1,533
Rowbotham, M. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.21.1837 · Cited by 1,433
Effects of Desipramine, Amitriptyline, and Fluoxetine on Pain in Diabetic Neuropathy
Max, M. B., Lynch, S. A., Muir, J., Shoaf, S. E., Smoller, B., & Dubner, R. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199205073261904 · Cited by 1,117
Normative data for the HADS from a large non-clinical sample
Crawford, J. R., Henry, J. D., Crombie, C., & Taylor, E. P. (2001) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466501163904 · Cited by 815 · cited 1×
“of tablets rescue medication 187 80 177 71 Sleep interference (baseline) 4 (2-5) 4 (2-5) Sleep interference (end of therapy) 4 (1-5) 3 (1-5) HAD depression scale (baseline) 15 (5-25) 14 (5-25) HAD depression scale (end of therapy) 14 (5-25) 12 (4-22) Barthel index (baseline) 85 (65-100) 90 (70-105) Barthel index (end…”
A summary of mechanistic hypotheses of gabapentin pharmacology
Taylor, C. P., Gee, N. S., Su, T.-Z., Kocsis, J. D., Welty, D. F., Brown, J. P., Dooley, D. J., Boden, P., & Singh, L. (1998) · Epilepsy Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-1211(97)00084-3 · Cited by 774
Gabapentin in postherpetic neuralgia: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study
Rice, A. S. C., & Maton, S. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00407-9 · Cited by 596
Jensen, T. S., Krebs, B., Nielsen, J., & Rasmussen, P. (1985) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(85)90090-9 · Cited by 587
Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study
Kooijman, C. M., Dijkstra, P. U., Geertzen, J. H. B., Elzinga, A., & van der Schans, C. P. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00264-5 · Cited by 501
Nikolajsen, L., & Jensen, T. S. (2001) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/87.1.107 · Cited by 493
Morello, C. M., Leckband, S. G., Stoner, C. P., Moorhouse, D. F., & Sahagian, G. A. (1999) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.159.16.1931 · Cited by 445
Cited by
Pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain: Evidence-based recommendations
Dworkin, R. H., O’Connor, A. B., Backonja, M., Farrar, J. T., Finnerup, N. B., Jensen, T. S., Kalso, E. A., Loeser, J. D., Miaskowski, C., Nurmikko, T. J., et al. (2007) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.033 · Cited by 2,126
EFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2010 revision
Attal, N., Cruccu, G., Baron, R., Haanpää, M., Hansson, P., Jensen, T. S., & Nurmikko, T. (2010) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02999.x · Cited by 1,873
Validity of four pain intensity rating scales
Ferreira-Valente, M. A., Pais-Ribeiro, J. L., & Jensen, M. P. (2011) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005 · Cited by 1,872
Transition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain: risk factors and protective factors
Katz, J., & Seltzer, Z. (2009) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/ern.09.20 · Cited by 782
Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults
Wiffen, P. J., Derry, S., Bell, R. F., Rice, A. S., Tölle, T. R., Phillips, T., & Moore, R. A. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007938.pub4 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- BONE, M., CRITCHLEY, P., & BUGGY, D.
- Venue
- Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 481-486
- ISSN
- 1098-7339 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976066489
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 11.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gabapentin in postamputation phantom limb pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/rapm.2002.35169
- The paper
- BONE, M., CRITCHLEY, P., & BUGGY, D. (2002). Gabapentin in postamputation phantom limb pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1053/rapm.2002.35169
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.