Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain

Jensen, Mark P., Smith, Douglas G., Ehde, Dawn M., Robinsin, Lawrence R.·2001·Pain

Abstract

Research among persons with cancer pain suggests that the association between pain intensity and pain interference is non-linear. That is, pain begins to have a serious impact on functioning when it reaches a certain threshold level (about 5 on 0--10 scales). Often, a second pain threshold can be identified which, once reached, shows an even greater proportional negative impact on functioning. This finding supports the potential clinical utility of classifying pain as mild, moderate, and severe based on the impact of pain on quality of life, and research among persons with cancer pain supports specific cutoffs (mild: 1--4, moderate: 5--6, severe: 7--10, see Pain 61 (1995) 277) for this classification. The current study sought to replicate the non-linear association between pain and pain interference in a non-cancer pain sample, determine whether the cutoffs that have been identified as optimal for cancer patients are also optimal for persons with pain associated with amputation, and determine whether the optimal cutoffs replicate across pain types (in this case, phantom limb, back, and general pain) within a single sample. Two-hundred and five persons with acquired amputation and phantom limb pain, back pain, or both, rated their average pain intensity and degree of pain interference for each type of pain. The results support a non-linear association between pain intensity and pain interference. However, the optimal cutoffs for classifying mild, moderate and severe pain in the present sample replicated the findings for persons with cancer pain only for back pain -- different optimal cutoffs were found for phantom limb and general pain. Moreover, the degree of pain interference appeared to vary as a function of pain type. The same level of back pain interfered more significantly with daily function than phantom limb pain did after pain levels reached five or more (on a 0--10 scale). These findings have implications for understanding the meaning of pain intensity levels, as well as for the assessment of pain intensity in persons with amputation-related pain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00459-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Becker, 2000, Treatment outcome of chronic non-malignant pain patients managed in a Danish multidisciplinary pain centre compared to general practice: a randomized controlled trial., Pain, 84, 203, 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00209-2 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cleeland, 1984, The impact of pain on the patient with cancer., Cancer, 54, 2635, 10.1002/1097-0142(19841201)54:2+<2635::AID-CNCR2820541407>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ehde, 2000, Chronic pain sensations, phantom pain, residual limb pain, and other regional pain after lower limb amputation., Arch Med Rehab, 81, 1039, 10.1053/apmr.2000.7583 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ekblom, 1988, Pain intensity measurements in patients with acute pain receiving afferent stimulation., J Neurol Nurosurg Psychiatry, 51, 481, 10.1136/jnnp.51.4.481 · DOI
  5. Porta, 2000, A comparative trial of botulinum toxin type A and methylprednisolone for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome and pain from chronic muscle spasm., Pain, 85, 101, 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00264-X · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00264-x
  6. Serlin, 1995, When is cancer pain mild, moderate or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with function., Pain, 61, 277, 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00178-H · DOI · Paper page
  7. Smith, 1999, Phantom limb, residual limb, and back pain after lower extremity amputations., Clin Orthopaed Rel Res, 361, 29, 10.1097/00003086-199904000-00005 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Stahmer, 1998, Do quantitative changes in pain intensity correlated with pain relief and satisfaction?, Acad Emerg Med, 5, 851, 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02811.x · DOI
  9. Von Korff, 1992, Grading the severity of chronic pain., Pain, 50, 133, 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Waling, 2000, Perceived pain before and after three exercise programs - a controlled clinical trial of women with work-related trapezius myalgia., Pain, 85, 201, 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00265-1 · DOI

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Jensen, M. P., Smith, D. G., Ehde, D. M., & Robinsin, L. R.
Venue
Pain
Published
2001-04
Volume
91
Issue
3
Pages
317-322
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034849898
Cited by
313
References
1
FWCI
7.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00459-0
The paper
Jensen, M. P., Smith, D. G., Ehde, D. M., & Robinsin, L. R. (2001). Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00459-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.