The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Farrar, J. T., Young, J. P., LaMoreaux, L., Werth, J. L., & Poole, M. R. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00349-9 · Cited by 5,808
Serlin, R. C., Mendoza, T. R., Nakamura, Y., Edwards, K. R., & Cleeland, C. S. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00178-h · Cited by 1,494
de C. Williams, A. C. (1995) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(95)90016-0 · Cited by 1,470
Price, D. D., Bush, F. M., Long, S., & Harkins, S. W. (1994) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)90097-3 · Cited by 1,174
Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures
Farrar, J. T., Portenoy, R. K., Berlin, J. A., Kinman, J. L., & Strom, B. L. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00339-0 · Cited by 1,071
(1992) · Cited by 881
Anticonvulsant drugs for management of pain: a systematic review
McQuay, H., Carroll, D., Jadad, A. R., Wiffen, P., & Moore, A. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7012.1047 · Cited by 713
Jensen, M. P., Smith, D. G., Ehde, D. M., & Robinsin, L. R. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00459-0 · Cited by 313
Self-citationManagement of Cancer Pain, Clinical Practice Guideline No. 9.
ROSENBERG, M. B. (1996) · Anesthesia Progress · Cited by 262
What is a ‘clinically meaningful’ reduction in pain?
Rowbotham, M. C. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00371-2 · Cited by 244
Cited by
Hawker, G. A., Mian, S., Kendzerska, T., & French, M. (2011) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.20543 · Cited by 4,924
Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Wyrwich, K. W., Beaton, D., Cleeland, C. S., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Kerns, R. D., Ader, D. N., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005 · Cited by 3,471
Self-citationThe prevalence of postoperative pain in a sample of 1490 surgical inpatients
Sommer, M., de Rijke, J. M., van Kleef, M., Kessels, A. G. H., Peters, M. L., Geurts, J. W. J. M., Gramke, H.-F., & Marcus, M. A. E. (2008) · European Journal of Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1017/s0265021507003031 · Cited by 471
Kersten, P., White, P. J., & Tennant, A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099485 · Cited by 225
Predictors of acute postoperative pain after elective surgery
Sommer, M., de Rijke, J. M., van Kleef, M., Kessels, A. G. H., Peters, M. L., Geurts, J. W., Patijn, J., Gramke, H.-F., & Marcus, M. A. E. (2010) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e3181b43d68 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 407-414
- ISSN
- 1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005886529
- Cited by
- 1,312
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8
- The paper
- Jensen, M. (2003). Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. The Journal of Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
