Cognitions, coping and social environment predict adjustment to phantom limb pain
Abstract
Biopsychosocial models of chronic pain hypothesize a role for psychological and environmental factors in adjustment to chronic pain. To test the utility of such models for understanding phantom limb pain, 61 persons with recent amputations were administered measures of average phantom limb pain intensity, pain interference, depression, pain coping use, pain cognitions and appraisals, and social environmental variables 1 month post-amputation, and the measures of pain intensity, pain interference, and depression again 5 months later. Multiple regression analyses showed that the psychosocial predictors made a statistically significant contribution to the concurrent prediction of average phantom limb pain, pain interference, and depression at the initial assessment, and a significant contribution to the prediction of subsequent change in pain interference and depression over the course of 5 months. The results support the utility of studying phantom limb pain from a biopsychosocial perspective, and identify specific biopsychosocial factors (e.g., catastrophizing cognitions, social support, solicitous responses from family members, and resting as a coping response) that may play an important role in adjustment to phantom limb pain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies indicate that the DNIC response is more pronounced in males than females, suggesting better endogenous pain inhibition in males.
“Several studies indicate the DNIC response is more pronounced in males than females, suggesting better functioning of the endogenous pain inhibitory system among males 176–178.”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [176]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 241
- Authors
- Jensen, M. P., Ehde, D. M., Hoffman, A. J., Patterson, D. R., Czerniecki, J. M., & Robinson, L. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jensen, Mark P.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-142
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082857192
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 11.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01 HD/NS33988)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- phantom limb pain, chronic pain, biopsychosocial model, pain-related cognitions, pain coping, social support, pain catastrophizing, depression, pain interference, amputation
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Phantom Limb, Regression Analysis, Social Environment, Social Support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review