Cited by 616Hip and Femur FracturesPain Management and Opioid UseAnesthesia and Pain Management

The impact of post-operative pain on outcomes following hip fracture

Morrison, Sean R., Magaziner, Jay, McLaughlin, Mary Ann, Orosz, Gretchen, Silberzweig, Stacey B, Koval, Kenneth J, Siu, Albert L·2003·Pain

Abstract

Untreated pain is a major health care issue and very little is known about the treatment of pain and the effect of pain on post-operative outcomes in older adults. This study was performed to identify the impact of pain on outcomes following hip fracture in older adults. Four hundred and eleven consecutive cognitively intact patients admitted with hip fracture to four New York hospitals were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Patients were interviewed daily using standardized pain assessments. We used multiple logistic regression and ordinary least squares linear regression to examine the association of post-operative pain on immediate post-operative outcomes (duration of stay, physical therapy sessions missed or shortened, ambulation following surgery, and post-operative complications) and outcomes 6 months following fracture (locomotion, mortality, return to the community, residual pain). Patients with higher pain scores at rest had significantly longer hospital lengths of stay (P=0.03), were significantly more likely to have physical therapy sessions missed or shortened (P=0.002), were significantly less likely to be ambulating by post-operative day 3 (P<0.001), took significantly longer to ambulate past a bedside chair (P=0.01), and had significantly lower locomotion scores at 6 months (P=0.02). Pain at rest was not significantly associated with post-operative complications, nursing home placement, survival at 6 months, or residual pain at 6 months. Post-operative pa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00458-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morrison, S. R., Magaziner, J., McLaughlin, M. A., Orosz, G., Silberzweig, S. B., Koval, K. J., & Siu, A. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Morrison, Sean R.
Venue
Pain
Published
2003-06
Volume
103
Issue
3
Pages
303-311
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077625499
Cited by
616
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 33
FWCI
12.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k08ag000833-04)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (U18 HS 09459-0)
  • National Institute on Aging (K08 AG 00833-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
postoperative pain, hip fracture, older adults, length of hospital stay, ambulation, physiotherapy, postoperative complications, functional recovery, residual pain, opioid analgesics, pain management, nursing home admission, mortality
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Hip Fractures, Humans, Length of Stay, Locomotion, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, New York City, Pain Measurement, Postoperative Pain, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Geriatric Assessment, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Physical Therapy Specialty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review