Cited by 12Pain Management and Opioid UseHip and Femur FracturesGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Pain treatments after hip fracture among older nursing home residents

Open access
Zullo, Andrew R., Zhang, Tingting, Beaudoin, Francesca L., Lee, Yoojin, McConeghy, Kevin W., Kiel, Douglas P., Daiello, Lori A., Mor, Vincent +1 more·2018·Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract

Objectives To examine the association between use of opioids versus other analgesics with death and functioning after hip fracture in older nursing home (NH) residents. Design Retrospective cohort using national Medicare fee-for-service claims linked to the Minimum Data Set. Setting U.S. NHs. Participants NH residents aged ≥65 years who became a long-stay resident (>100 days in the NH) between January 2008 and December 2009, had a hospitalized hip fracture, and returned to the NH. Exposure New use of opioid versus non-opioid analgesics (acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) within 14 days post-hip fracture. Measurements Follow up began on the index date and continued until the first occurrence of death, significant functional decline (3-point increase on MDS Activities of Daily Living scale), or 120 days of follow-up. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes were estimated using inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted multinomial logistic regression models. Results Among the 2,755 NH residents with a hip fracture included in our study, 1,155 (41.9%) were opioid users and 1,600 (58.1%) were non-opioid analgesic users. The mean age was 86.3 years, 73.8% were female, and 86.0% were white race. Opioid use was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of death (OR=0.47, 95% CI 0.39–0.56) and a non-significant decrease in functional decline (OR=0.77, 95% CI 0.58–1.03). Conclusion A rigorous study that addresses the limitations of this study is critical to validate our preliminary findings and provide evidence about the effect of using opioid versus non-opioid analgesics to optimize acute pain in NH residents with a hip fracture.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.11.008

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In older nursing home residents, opioid use in the immediate 14-day period post-hip fracture was associated with a lower likelihood of death and functional decline.

    “Of interest, a study assessing opioid use in the immediate 14-day period post-hip fracture in older nursing home residents found that opioid use in that period was associated with a lower likelihood of death and functional decline (234).”

    From Exogenous Opioids and the Human Endocrine System: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement (2024) · cites this paper as [234]

    The Methods describe opioid use within 14 days after hip fracture in older nursing home residents. The Results report a significantly lower likelihood of death, but the lower estimate for functional decline was not statistically significant after adjustment. The claim omits that uncertainty. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zullo, A. R., Zhang, T., Beaudoin, F. L., Lee, Y., McConeghy, K. W., Kiel, D. P., Daiello, L. A., Mor, V., & Berry, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Zullo, Andrew R.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
174-176
ISSN
1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2777786745
Cited by
12
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of Academic Affiliations, Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Institute on Aging (5R01AG045441)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (5K12HS022998)
  • Health Services Research and Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
hip fracture, opioid analgesics, non-opioid analgesics, nursing home residents, older adults, postoperative pain management, mortality, functional decline, activities of daily living, paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analgesics, Analgesics, Opioid, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Medicare, Hip Fractures, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Postoperative Pain, Retrospective Studies, United States, Drug Utilization Review

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review