The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lamotrigine (Lamictal) in refractory trigeminal neuralgia: results from a double-blind placebo controlled crossover trial
Abstract
Lamotrigine is a chemically novel antiepileptic drug which has not been adequately assessed for its antineuralgic properties. It was used in a double-blind placebo controlled crossover trial in 14 patients with refractory trigeminal neuralgia. Patients continued to take a steady dose of carbamazepine or phenytoin throughout the trial over a 31-day period. Each arm of the trial lasted 2 weeks with an intervening 3-day washout period. The maintenance dose of lamotrigine was 400 mg. Lamotrigine was superior to placebo (P = 0.011) based on analysis of a composite efficacy index which compared the numbers of patients assigned greater efficacy on lamotrigine with those assigned greater efficacy on placebo. Efficacy for one treatment over another was determined according to a hierarchy of: (i) use of escape medication; (ii) total pain scores; or (iii) global evaluations. Eleven of the 13 patients eligible for inclusion in the composite efficacy index showed better efficacy on lamotrigine compared with placebo. Global evaluations further suggested that patients did better on lamotrigine than placebo (P = 0.025). The adverse reactions with both lamotrigine and placebo were predominantly dose-dependent effects on the central nervous system. A 14th patient withdrew from the study due to severe pain during the placebo arm of the trial. It would appear that lamotrigine has antineuralgic properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
EFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2010 revision
Attal, N., Cruccu, G., Baron, R., Haanpää, M., Hansson, P., Jensen, T. S., & Nurmikko, T. (2010) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02999.x · Cited by 1,873
Self-citationAAN-EFNS guidelines on trigeminal neuralgia management
Cruccu, G., Gronseth, G., Alksne, J., Argoff, C., Brainin, M., Burchiel, K., Nurmikko, T., & Zakrzewska, J. M. (2008) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02185.x · Cited by 726
Self-citationEuropean Academy of Neurology guideline on trigeminal neuralgia
Bendtsen, L., Zakrzewska, J. M., Abbott, J., Braschinsky, M., Di Stefano, G., Donnet, A., Eide, P. K., Leal, P. R. L., Maarbjerg, S., May, A., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/ene.13950 · Cited by 668
Self-citationTrigeminal neuralgia—pathophysiology, diagnosis and current treatment
Nurmikko, T. J., & Eldridge, P. R. (2001) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/87.1.117 · Cited by 417
Self-citationDworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Peirce-Sandner, S., Baron, R., Bellamy, N., Burke, L. B., Chappell, A., Chartier, K., Cleeland, C. S., Costello, A., et al. (2010) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.018 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Zakrzewska, J. M., Chaudhry, Z., Nurmikko, T. J., Patton, D. W., & Mullens, L. E.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 223-230
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979145649
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lamotrigine (Lamictal) in refractory trigeminal neuralgia: results from a double-blind placebo controlled crossover trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00104-8
- The paper
- Zakrzewska, J. M., Chaudhry, Z., Nurmikko, T. J., Patton, D. W., & Mullens, L. E. (1997). Lamotrigine (Lamictal) in refractory trigeminal neuralgia: results from a double-blind placebo controlled crossover trial. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00104-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.