CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 186Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPain Management and Opioid Use

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reliability and factor structure of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory – Swedish Language Version (MPI-S)

Bergström, Gunnar, Jensen, Irene B, Bodin, Lennart, Linton, Steven J, Nygren, Åke L, Carlsson, Sven G·1998·Pain
DOI 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00210-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The psychological assessment of chronic pain is often accomplished using questionnaires such as the (West Haven-Yale) Multidimensional Pain Inventory ((WHY)MPI) which is constructed to capture the multidimensionality of chronic pain. The (WHY)MPI theoretically originates from behavioural and cognitive behavioural theories of pain. It is divided into three parts and measures psychosocial and behavioural consequences of pain. This questionnaire has displayed satisfactory psychometric properties and translations of the original English version into German and Dutch have been demonstrated to be reliable and valid. The aim of this study was to test the reliability and factor structure of a Swedish translation of the (WHY)MPI, the MPI-S, and also to test the generalisability of the factor structure found for the (WHY)MPI. We performed analyses of internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, and carried out a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) employing LISREL-8 on a population of 682 patients suffering from chronic musculoskeletal pain. Test-retest analysis was accomplished on a sub-sample of 54 individuals taken from the aforementioned population. For sections 1 and 2 of the MPI-S the overall reliability and stability were good, and after the exclusion of four items, the factor structure was similar to other versions of the MPI. For section 3, despite removal of five questions, the proposed factor structure could not be replicated. This part of the inventory is designed to measure the extent of different types of activities, and our results suggest that this section may only be used for assessing general activity level. We conclude that, with a few adjustments, the analyses yielded satisfactory results for sections 1 and 2 of the MPI-S regarding its factor structure, reliability and generalisability. For section 3 the hypothesised factor structure could not be confirmed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00210-8

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bollen, 1990, Bull, 107, 256
  2. Campbell, 1959, Bull, 56, 81
  3. Feuerstein, 1987, Rev, 7, 243
  4. Fordyce, 1988, Assoc, 43, 376
  5. Jensen, 1997, Ther, 26, 36
  6. Marsh, 1988, Bull, 103, 391
  7. Turk, 1987, Ther, 25, 237
  8. Turk, 1988, Psychol, 56, 233

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–186 of 186

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bergström, G., Jensen, I. B., Bodin, L., Linton, S. J., Nygren, Å. L., & Carlsson, S. G.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Örebro University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Bergström, Gunnar
ORCID
Venue
Pain
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
1998-03
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
101-110
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00210-8
OpenAlex
W2031134157
Cited by
186
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
Multidimensional Pain Inventory, chronic pain, Swedish translation, psychometric properties, factor structure, reliability statistics, chronic musculoskeletal pain, test-retest reliability, internal consistency
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Behavior, Chronic Disease, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Pain, Psychology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden, Translations, Discriminant Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review