Cited by 13Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

Pain avoidance predicts disability and depressive symptoms three years later in individuals with whiplash complaints

Zetterqvist, V., Holmström, L., Maathz, P., Wicksell, R. K.·2017·Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Longstanding symptoms due to whiplash are commonly associated with decreased levels of emotional and physical functioning. To date, there is strong empirical support for the relationship between psychological in/flexibility and pain-related functioning, but the predictive role for future health is largely unknown. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate if psychological in/flexibility (i.e. avoidance and cognitive fusion) predicted pain disability and depressive symptoms 3 years later in individuals with whiplash complaints. METHODS: Data were collected at baseline and at a 3 year follow-up from 368 members of a national patient organization for people with whiplash-associated disorder. In a series of hierarchical regression analyses, background variables, pain related variables, psychological distress and psychological inflexibility at baseline were evaluated as predictors of levels of pain disability and depressive symptoms at follow-up. RESULTS: Results showed that psychological inflexibility, and more specifically avoidance, was a unique predictor of pain disability and depressive symptoms, also when controlling for background variables, pain related variables and psychological distress. Level of education was also found to predict both pain disability and symptoms of depression. Lastly, pain variability predicted pain disability, and anxiety predicted depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: Pain avoidance significantly predicted pain disability and depressive symptoms 3 years later. Although tentative, results warrant more studies to further explore the importance of pain avoidance for future health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aas.12874

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zetterqvist, V., Holmström, L., Maathz, P., & Wicksell, R. K.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Zetterqvist, V.
Venue
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-23
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
445-455
ISSN
  • 0001-5172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-6576
OpenAlex
W2590945555
Cited by
13
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kommunfullmäktige, Stockholms Stad
  • Karolinska Institutet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
whiplash-associated disorders, pain avoidance, psychological inflexibility, cognitive fusion, pain-related disability, depressive symptoms, long-term outcomes, pain variability, anxiety, educational attainment, psychological distress
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Cognition, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Educational Status, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Pain, Pain Measurement, Predictive Value of Tests, Stress, Psychological, Whiplash Injuries, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review