The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pain report and the relationship of pain to physical factors in the first 6 months following spinal cord injury
Abstract
A prospective, longitudinal study of 100 people with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) was performed to determine the time of onset. prevalence and severity of different types of pain (musculoskeletal, visceral, neuropathic at level, neuropathic below level) at 2, 4, 8, 13 and 26 weeks following SCI. In addition, we sought to determine the relationship between physical factors such as level of lesion, completeness and clinical SCI syndrome and the presence of pain. At 6 months following SCI, 40% of people had musculoskeletal pain, none had visceral pain, 36% had neuropathic at level pain and 19% had neuropathic below level pain. When all types of pain were included, at 6 months following injury, 64% of people in the study had pain, and 21% of people had pain that was rated as severe. Those with neuropathic below level pain were most likely to report their pain as severe or excruciating. There was no relationship between the presence of pain overall and level or completeness of lesion, or type of injury. Significant differences were found, however, when specific types of pain were examined. Musculoskeletal pain was more common in people with thoracic level injuries. Neuropathic pain associated with allodynia was more common in people who had incomplete spinal cord lesions, cervical rather than thoracic spinal cord lesions, and central cord syndrome. Therefore, this study suggests that most people continue to experience pain 6 months following spinal cord injury and 21% of people continue to experience severe pain. While the presence or absence of pain overall does not appear to be related to physical factors following SCI, there does appear to be a relationship between physical factors and pain when the pain is classified into specific types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Siddall, P. J., McClelland, J. M., Rutkowski, S. B., & Cousins, M. J. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00452-9 · Cited by 964
Self-citationSteeves, J. D., Lammertse, D., Curt, A., Fawcett, J. W., Tuszynski, M. H., Ditunno, J. F., Ellaway, P. H., Fehlings, M. G., Guest, J. D., Kleitman, N., et al. (2007) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3102008 · Cited by 470
Neuropathic pain prevalence following spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Burke, D., Fullen, B. M., Stokes, D., & Lennon, O. (2017) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.905 · Cited by 402
Kwon, B. K., Stammers, A. M. T., Belanger, L. M., Bernardo, A., Chan, D., Bishop, C. M., Slobogean, G. P., Zhang, H., Umedaly, H., Giffin, M., et al. (2010) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1080 · Cited by 310
Pain and dysesthesia in patients with spinal cord injury: A postal survey
Finnerup, N., Johannesen, I., Sindrup, S., Bach, F., & Jensen, T. (2001) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101161 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Siddall, P. J., Taylor, D. A., McClelland, J. M., Rutkowski, S. B., & Cousins, M. J.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1999-05-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 187-197
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071450269
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pain report and the relationship of pain to physical factors in the first 6 months following spinal cord injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00023-8
- The paper
- Siddall, P. J., Taylor, D. A., McClelland, J. M., Rutkowski, S. B., & Cousins, M. J. (1999). Pain report and the relationship of pain to physical factors in the first 6 months following spinal cord injury. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00023-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.