CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 531Pain Management and Placebo EffectPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dissociation of sensory and affective dimensions of pain using hypnotic modulation.

Rainville, Pierre, Carrier, Benoît, Hofbauer, Robert K., Bushnell, Catherine M., Duncan, Gary H.·1999·Pain
DOI 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00048-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Understanding the complex nature of pain perception requires the ability to separately analyze its psychological dimensions and their interaction, and relate them to specific variables and responses. The present study, therefore, attempted to selectively modulate the sensory and affective dimensions of pain, using a cognitive intervention, and to assess the possible relationship between these psychological dimensions of pain and changes in physiological responses to the noxious stimuli. In three experiments, normal subjects trained in hypnosis rated pain intensity and pain unpleasantness produced by a tonic heat-pain stimulus (1-min immersion of the hand in 45.0-47.5 degrees C water). Two experiments were designed to test hypnotic suggestions to decrease (Experiment one (Section 2.5.1)), or increase and decrease (Experiment two (Section 2.5.2)) pain affect. Suggestions in Experiment three (Section 2.5.3) were directed towards an increase or decrease in pain sensation. In Experiments one and two (Sections 2.5.1 and 2.5.2), the significant modulation in pain unpleasantness ratings was largely independent of variations in perceived pain intensity. Moreover, in Experiment two (Section 2.5.2), there was a significant correlation between the stimulus-evoked heart-rate increase and ratings of pain unpleasantness, but not of pain intensity, suggesting a direct functional interaction between pain affect and autonomic activation. In Experiment three (Section 2.5.3), suggestions to modulate the sensory aspect of pain produced significant modulation of pain intensity ratings, with secondary changes in pain unpleasantness ratings. Hypnotic susceptibility (Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale form A) was specifically correlated to pain unpleasantness modulation in Experiment two (Section 2.5.2) and to pain intensity modulation in Experiment three (Section 2.5.3), suggesting that this factor relates to the primary process toward which hypnotic suggestions are directed. The specific pain dimension on which hypnotic suggestions act depends on the content of the instructions and is not a characteristic of hypnosis itself. Results are consistent with a successive-stage model of pain perception (e.g. Wade JB, Dougherty LM, Archer CR, Price DD. Assessing the stages of pain processing: a multivariate analytical approach. Pain 1996;68:157-167) which provides a conceptual framework necessary to study the cerebral representation of pain perception.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00048-2

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hofbauer, 1998, Modulation of pain sensation alters activity in human cerebral cortex., Soc Neurosci Abstr, 24, 4475

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 531

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rainville, P., Carrier, B., Hofbauer, R. K., Bushnell, C. M., & Duncan, G. H.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Duncan, Gary H.
ORCID
Venue
Pain
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
1999-08-01
Volume
82
Issue
2
Pages
159-171
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00048-2
OpenAlex
W2159200925
Cited by
530
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 26
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
hypnotic suggestion, pain perception, pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, hypnotic susceptibility, tonic heat pain, heart rate, autonomic activation, cognitive intervention
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Analysis of Variance, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Hypnosis, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Sensation, Suggestion, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review