The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A retrospective cohort study of post mastectomy pain syndrome
Abstract
Post mastectomy pain syndrome is a condition which can occur following breast surgery and has until recently been regarded as uncommon. Recent reports have suggested that it may affect 20% or more of women following mastectomy. The symptoms are distressing and may be difficult to treat however treatment for neuropathic pain can be successful. This paper reports a retrospective cohort of consecutive mastectomy cases over a six year period in one region of whom 511 survivors were traced and eligible for survey. A total of 408 completed a questionnaire survey which revealed that 175 (43%) had ever suffered from postmastectomy pain syndrome and 119 (29%) reported current symptoms although the majority were decreasing in intensity. A striking finding was the very high cumulative prevalence in younger women (65%) decreasing to 26% in the over 70 year group. The details of the onset, frequency and intensity of symptoms are described along with their natural history. The age effect on the frequency of the syndrome influences the marital status, employment status, housing, and educational status of those who report typical symptoms. Body weight and height are also associated with the frequency of post mastectomy pain syndrome. Relationship between the frequency of post mastectomy pain syndrome and radiotherapy, chemotherapy and the use of tamoxifen are difficult to unravel because of the combinations of pre and post operative treatments received confounded by age. The implications of a much higher frequency of post mastectomy pain are discussed with regard to management and counselling. The high frequency of the syndrome in the younger women is important and possible explanations are explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chronic post-surgical pain: 10 years on
Macrae, W. A. (2008) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aen099 · Cited by 992
Risk Factors for Chronic Pain Following Breast Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Study
Poleshuck, E. L., Katz, J., Andrus, C. H., Hogan, L. A., Jung, B. F., Kulick, D. I., & Dworkin, R. H. (2006) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2006.02.007 · Cited by 555
Andersen, K. G., & Kehlet, H. (2011) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.005 · Cited by 523
Neuropathic pain following breast cancer surgery: proposed classification and research update
Jung, B. F., Ahrendt, G. M., Oaklander, A. L., & Dworkin, R. H. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00241-0 · Cited by 476
Psychosocial predictors and correlates for chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP)—a systematic review.
Hinrichs‐Rocker, A., Schulz, K., Järvinen, I., Lefering, R., Simanski, C., & Neugebauer, E. A. M. (2009) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.07.015 · Cited by 461
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, C. S. W., Bourne, D., Squair, J., Phillips, D. O., & Chambers, A. W.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-95
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006957372
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A retrospective cohort study of post mastectomy pain syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00076-7
- The paper
- Smith, C. S. W., Bourne, D., Squair, J., Phillips, D. O., & Chambers, A. W. (1999). A retrospective cohort study of post mastectomy pain syndrome. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00076-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.