The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of acupuncture and a newly designed placebo needle in rotator cuff tendinitis
Abstract
Acupuncture has gained increasing attention in the treatment of chronic pain. The lack of a satisfying placebo method has made it impossible to show whether needling is an important part of the method or whether the improvement felt by the patient is due to the therapeutic setting and psychological phenomena. Also, the effectiveness of acupuncture has not been demonstrated sufficiently. We treated 52 sportsmen with rotator cuff tendinitis in a randomised single-blind clinical trial using a new placebo-needle as control. Patients were treated for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint of the trial was the change in the modified Constant-Murley-score from the baseline. Assessment of the treatment outcome was made by experienced orthopaedists not informed of the treatment allocation. Acupuncture with penetration of the skin was shown to be more effective than a similar therapeutic setting with placebo needling in the treatment of pain. The acupuncture-group improved 19.2 Constant-Murley-score points (SD 16.1, range from -13 to 50), the control-group improved 8.37 points (SD 14.56, range from -20 to 41), (P=0.014; C.I. 2.3;19.4). This study showed that needling is an important part of the acupuncture effect in the treatment of chronic shoulder pain in athletes. No conclusions can be derived from this study concerning the importance of choosing points and the rules of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Using the new placebo method as control for other ailments could improve the evidence of specific acupuncture effects beyond pain treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Clinical Method of Functional Assessment of the Shoulder
Constant, C. R., & G. Murley, A. H. (1987) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-198701000-00023 · Cited by 5,300
Introducing a placebo needle into acupuncture research
Streitberger, K., & Kleinhenz, J. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)10471-8 · Cited by 905
Self-citationChinese acupuncture and moxibustion
Cheng, X., & Deng, L.-Y. (1987) · Foreign Languages Press eBooks · Cited by 634
The needle effect in the relief of myofascial pain
Lewit, K. (1979) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(79)90142-8 · Cited by 405
Green, S., Buchbinder, R., Glazier, R., & Forbes, A. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7128.354 · Cited by 327
Placebo controls for acupuncture studies.
Vincent, C. A., & Lewith, G. T. (1995) · PubMed Central · Cited by 300
Evaluation of the clinical effects of acupuncture
Lewith, G., & Vincent, C. (1995) · Pain Forum · doi:10.1016/s1082-3174(11)80073-5 · Cited by 244
On the evaluation of the clinical effects of acupuncture
Lewith, G. T., & Machin, D. (1983) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(83)90202-6 · Cited by 243
A Meta-Analysis of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain
PATEL, M., GUTZWILLER, F., PACCAUD, F., & MARAZZI, A. (1989) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/18.4.900 · Cited by 179
Bing, Z., Villanueva, L., & Le Bars, D. (1990) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(90)90110-p · Cited by 169
Cited by
Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements
Vickers, A. J., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123 · Cited by 2,116
MacPherson, H., Altman, D. G., Hammerschlag, R., Youping, L., Taixiang, W., White, A., Moher, D., & on behalf of the STRICTA Revision Group (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000261 · Cited by 1,382
Components of placebo effect: randomised controlled trial in patients with irritable bowel syndrome
Kaptchuk, T. J., Kelley, J. M., Conboy, L. A., Davis, R. B., Kerr, C. E., Jacobson, E. E., Kirsch, I., Schyner, R. N., Nam, B. H., Nguyen, L. T., et al. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39524.439618.25 · Cited by 1,196
Acupuncture for Chronic Pain: Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis
Vickers, A. J., Cronin, A. M., Maschino, A. C., Lewith, G., MacPherson, H., Foster, N. E., Sherman, K. J., Witt, C. M., Linde, K., & Acupuncture Trialists' Collaboration, F. T. (2012) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3654 · Cited by 985
Vickers, A. J. (2001) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-1-6 · Cited by 559
Metadata
- Authors
- Kleinhenz, J., Streitberger, K., Windeler, J., Gübacher, A., Mavridis, G., & Martin, E.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-241
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123494660
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 23.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of acupuncture and a newly designed placebo needle in rotator cuff tendinitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00107-4
- The paper
- Kleinhenz, J., Streitberger, K., Windeler, J., Gübacher, A., Mavridis, G., & Martin, E. (1999). Randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of acupuncture and a newly designed placebo needle in rotator cuff tendinitis. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00107-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.