Cited by 205Statistical Methods and InferenceStatistical Methods and ApplicationsSpatial and Panel Data Analysis

Consistent cross-validatory model-selection for dependent data: hv-block cross-validation

Racine, Jeff·2000·Journal of Econometrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-4076(00)00030-0

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To ensure a valid and realistic evaluation, the cross-validation approach deleted 10 samples on either side of the test set block to account for temporal dependency.

    “To ensure a valid and realistic evaluation of the model [59], we therefore deleted h samples on either side of the test set block. In our case, we chose h=10 since we included up to 10 preceding samples in the feature calculation (see Section 4.3).”

    From Detecting Developers' Task Switches and Types (2022) · cites this paper as [59]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Racine, J.
Venue
Journal of Econometrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-11
Volume
99
Issue
1
Pages
39-61
ISSN
0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014828134
Cited by
205
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Econometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Keywords
model selection, cross-validation, leave-one-out cross-validation, correlated data, asymptotic consistency, asymptotic optimality, stationary time series, predictive power

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review