Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5,763

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data

Open access
Kao, Chihwa·1999·Journal of Econometrics

Abstract

In the first half of the paper I study spurious regressions in panel data. Asymptotic properties of the least-squares dummy variable (LSDV) estimator and other conventional statistics are examined. The asymptotics of LSDV estimator are different from those of the spurious regression in the pure time-series. This has an important consequence for residual-based cointegration tests in panel data, because the null distribution of residual-based cointegration tests depends on the asymptotics of LSDV estimator. In the second half of the paper I study residual-based tests for cointegration regression in panel data. I study Dickey–Fuller (DF) tests and an augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) test to test the null of no cointegration. Asymptotic distributions of the tests are derived and Monte Carlo experiments are conducted to evaluate finite sample properties of the proposed tests.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00023-2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Breitung, 1994, Testing for unit roots in panel data: Are wages on different bargaining levels cointegrated? Applied Economics, 26, 353
  2. Gonzalo, 1994, Five alternative methods of estimating long-run equilibrium relationships, Journal of Econometrics, 60, 203, 10.1016/0304-4076(94)90044-2 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Hansen, 1992, Efficient estimation and testing of cointegrating vectors in the presence of deterministic trends, Journal of Econometrics, 53, 87, 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90081-2 · DOI
  4. Haug, 1996, Tests for cointegration: A Monte Carlo comparison, Journal of Econometrics, 71, 89, 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01696-8 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Kao, C., Chiang, M.-H., 1997. On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. Econometric Theory, Under Revision. · DOI · Paper page
  6. McCoskey, S., Kao, C., 1998. A residual-based test of the null of cointegration in panel data. Econometric Reviews 17, 57–84. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Phillips, 1990, Asymptotic properties of residual based test for cointegration, Econometrica, 58, 165, 10.2307/2938339 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Phillips, 1988, Testing for unit root in time series regression, Biometrika, 75, 335, 10.1093/biomet/75.2.335 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Quah, 1994, Exploiting cross section variation for unit root inference in dynamic data, Economics Letters, 44, 9, 10.1016/0165-1765(93)00302-5 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kao, C.
Venue
Journal of Econometrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-05
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
1-44
ISSN
0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125331782
Cited by
5,763
References
3
FWCI
61.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.