CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 59

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Conifer tar on the keel and hull planking of the Ma'agan Mikhael Ship (Israel, 5th century BC): identification and comparison with natural products and artefacts employed in boat construction

Connan, Jacques, Nissenbaum, Arie·2003·Journal of Archaeological Science
DOI 10.1016/s0305-4403(02)00243-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0305-4403(02)00243-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Bastow, 1999, Biodegradation of aromatic land-derived biomarkers in some Australian crude oils, Organic Geochemistry, 30, 1229, 10.1016/S0146-6380(99)00098-4 · DOI
  2. Beck, 1990, Ancient pine pitch: technological perspectives from a Hellenistic shipwreck, MASCA research papers in science and archaeology, 7, 51
  3. Beck, 1999, Central European pine tar technologies, Ancient Biomolecules, 2, 281
  4. Connan, 2002, Identification de poix et de résine de conifère dans des échantillons archéologiques du lac de Sanguinet : exportation de poix en Atlantique à l'époque gallo-romaine, Revue d'Archéométrie, 26, 177, 10.3406/arsci.2002.1032 · DOI
  5. Evershed, 1985, Pine wood origin for pitch from the Mary Rose, Nature, 314, 528, 10.1038/314528a0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kahanov, 1996, Conflicting evidence for defining the origin of the Ma'agan Mikhael shipwreck, Tropis, IV, 245
  7. Kahanov, 1997, Wood preservation of the Ma'agan Mikhael shipwreck, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 26, 316, 10.1006/ijna.1997.0083 · DOI
  8. Lequément, 1976, Une épave du Bas-Empire dans la Baie de Pampelone (presqu'ı̂le de Saint-Tropez), Revue archéologique de Narbonnaise, Tome IX, 177, 10.3406/ran.1976.994 · DOI
  9. Linder, 1992, Ma'agan Mikhael shipwreck – excavating an ancient merchantman, Biblical Archaeological Review, 18, 24
  10. Mills, 1977, Natural resins of art and archaeology: their source, chemistry and identification, Studies in Conservation, 22, 12, 10.2307/1505670 · DOI
  11. Pomey, 1995, Les épaves grecques et romaines de la Place Jules Verne à Marseille, Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 459, 10.3406/crai.1995.15483 · DOI
  12. Reunamen, 1989, Analysis of Finnish pine tar from the wreck of frigate St. Nicolai, Holzforschung, 43, 33, 10.1515/hfsg.1989.43.1.33 · DOI
  13. Reunamen, 1990, Long-term alteration of pine tar in a marine environment, Holzforschung, 44, 277
  14. Robinson, 1987, Proofs of a pine wood origin for pitch from Tudor (Mary Rose) and Etruscan shipwrecks: application of analytical chemistry in archaeology, Analyst, 112, 637, 10.1039/an9871200637 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Simoneit, 1998, Biomarker PAHs in the environment, vol. 3, 176
  16. White, 1990, Analysis of resinous materials, Atiqot, 19, 81

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 59

Metadata

Authors
Connan, J., & Nissenbaum, A.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-06
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
709-719
ISSN
0305-4403
DOI
10.1016/s0305-4403(02)00243-1
Cited by
59
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review