Rural Nonfarm Employment and Incomes in Brazil: Patterns and Evolution
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The most common rural off-farm employment was housecleaning.
“most commonly, housecleaning, as found elsewhere in Brazil (da Silva and Del Grossi 2001)”
From Explaining the persistence of low income and environmentally degrading land uses in the Brazilian Amazon (2017) · cites this paper as da Silva and Del Grossi 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Garrett, R. D., Gardner, T. A., Morello, T. F., Marchand, S., Barlow, J., Ezzine de Blas, D., Ferreira, J., Lees, A. C., & Parry, L. (2017) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09364-220327 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
- Authors
- Graziano da Silva, J., & Eduardo Del Grossi, M.
- Venue
- World Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 443-453
- ISSN
- 0305-750X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974347994
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 27.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- World Development (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Latin American rural development
- Keywords
- rural non-farm employment, rural income, rural-urban migration, rural urbanization, farm households, Brazil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
