Poverty Alleviation and Tropical Forests—What Scope for Synergies?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Promoting win-win outcomes at the conservation-development nexus in Amazonia has proven elusive because the development component has focused too heavily on income objectives.
“Finally, we suggest that promoting win-win outcomes at the conservation-development nexus in Amazonia has proven elusive (Wunder 2001) because the development component has focused too heavily on income objectives.”
From Explaining the persistence of low income and environmentally degrading land uses in the Brazilian Amazon (2017) · cites this paper as Wunder 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Effect of Rural Credit on Deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon
Assunção, J., Gandour, C., Rocha, R., & Rocha, R. (2020) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/uez060 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Garrett, R. D., Gardner, T. A., Morello, T. F., Marchand, S., Barlow, J., Ezzine de Blas, D., Ferreira, J., Lees, A. C., & Parry, L. (2017) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09364-220327 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wunder, S.
- Affiliations
- Center for International Forestry Research (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Wunder, Sven
- ORCID
- Wunder, Sven
- Venue
- World Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1817-1833
- ISSN
- 0305-750X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083670008
- Cited by
- 625
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 14.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- World Development (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
- Keywords
- poverty reduction, tropical forests, forest loss, natural forests, rural poverty, social safety nets, producer benefits, consumer benefits, agricultural land demand, sustainable forest development, conservation policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
