Cortisol levels of young children in full-day childcare centers: relations with age and temperament
Abstract
Cortisol levels of 70 children, aged 39-106 months, were sampled at home and at their full-day childcare centers at two times of day, mid-morning and mid-afternoon. Parents and teachers completed questionnaires assessing child temperament (negative affectivity, surgency or extroversion, and effortful control) and aggressive behavior. The results replicated a previous study showing increases in cortisol levels over the day at childcare for preschool-aged children, while home levels followed the expected circadian decrease in cortisol from morning to afternoon for most children regardless of age. At childcare, 3- and 4-year olds were more likely to show elevations in cortisol by mid-afternoon than were older children. Controlling statistically for age, shyness for boys, and poor self-control and aggression for both sexes were associated with increases in cortisol over the day at childcare. The results suggest that younger children and those with more immature social skills may frequently experience elevations in cortisol as the day progresses in group care contexts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Child-care studies show that children's physiological reactivity, indicated by morning-to-afternoon rising cortisol on days attending out-of-home programs, and emotional reactivity are affected by the quality of teacher sensitivity versus intrusiveness and attention.
“A series of child-care studies (both in center-based and home-based care) has consistently demonstrated that children’s physiological reactivity as indicated by morning-to-afternoon rising cortisol levels on days attending out-of-home programs as well as emotional reactivity is affected by the quality of sensitivity versus intrusiveness and attention provided by teachers in those settings”
From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as Dettling et al. 1999
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 43 · Cited by 304
- Authors
- Dettling, A. C., Gunnar, M. R., & Donzella, B.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dettling, Andrea C.
- Venue
- Psychoneuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 519-536
- ISSN
- 0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030666483
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- University of Minnesota
- National Institutes of Health (1r01mh056958-01)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH56958)
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD16494, R01HD016494)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Keywords
- cortisol, diurnal cortisol rhythm, preschool children, child temperament, negative affectivity, effortful control, aggression, shyness, age differences, group care
- MeSH terms
- Aggression, Arousal, Child, Child Day Care Centers, Child, Preschool, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Reference Values, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Temperament
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review