The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs
Abstract
Drug prevention in schools is a top priority in most Western countries and several well-designed studies have shown that prevention programs have the potential of reducing drug use in adolescents. However, most prevention programs are not effective and there are no general criteria available for deciding which program is effective and which is not. In this systematic review of the literature, the current scientific knowledge about which characteristics determine the effectiveness of drug prevention programs is examined. Three types of studies are reviewed: meta-analyses (3 studies were included), studies examining mediating variables of interventions (6 studies), and studies directly comparing prevention programs with or without specific characteristics (4 studies on boosters, 12 on peer-versus adult-led programs, and 5 on adding community interventions to school programs). Seven evidence-based quality criteria were formulated: the effects of a program should have been proven; interactive delivery methods are superior; the "social influence model" is the best we have; focus on norms, commitment not to use, and intentions not to use; adding community interventions increases effects; the use of peer leaders is better; and adding life skills to programs may strengthen effects.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is generally assumed that the most effective method to prevent substance use in this stage is the social influence approach”
From School-based programmes to reduce and prevent substance use in different age groups: What works for whom? Systematic review and meta-regression analysis (2016) · cites this paper as Cuijpers, 2002
Citations
Cites
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
(1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-03396-0 · Cited by 2,570
Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research
(1994) · doi:10.17226/2139 · Cited by 2,073
Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies
MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x9301700202 · Cited by 1,936
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Light, R. J., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291021 · Cited by 1,880
Meta-Analysis: Recent Developments in Quantitative Methods for Literature Reviews
Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59 · Cited by 1,780
Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research
Novins, D. K. (1995) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199503000-00028 · Cited by 1,085
Botvin, G. J. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520380042033 · Cited by 913
School-Based Adolescent Drug Prevention Programs: 1998 Meta-Analysis
Tobler, N. S., Roona, M., Ochshorn, P., Marshall, D., Streke, A., & Stackpole, K. M. (2000) · The Journal of Primary Prevention · doi:10.1023/a:1021314704811 · Cited by 757
A Multicommunity Trial for Primary Prevention of Adolescent Drug Abuse
Pentz, M. A. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.261.22.3259 · Cited by 629
Cited by
Sorted by citations
(2009) · Cited by 2,013
Wiers, R. W., Bartholow, B. D., van den Wildenberg, E., Thush, C., Engels, R. C. M. E., Sher, K. J., Grenard, J., Ames, S. L., & Stacy, A. W. (2007) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2006.09.021 · Cited by 734
The sustainability of public health interventions in schools: a systematic review
Herlitz, L., Macintyre, H. L., Osborn, T. G., & Bonell, C. P. (2020) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0961-8 · Cited by 454
The role of alcohol‐specific socialization in adolescents’ drinking behaviour
van der Vorst, H., Engels, R. C. M. E., Meeus, W., Deković, M., & van Leeuwe, J. (2005) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01193.x · Cited by 342
School-based programmes to prevent alcohol, tobacco and other drug use
Botvin, G. J., & Griffin, K. W. (2007) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540260701797753 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Cuijpers, P.
- Affiliations
- Trimbos Institute (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Cuijpers, Pim
- ORCID
- Cuijpers, Pim
- Venue
- Addictive Behaviors
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1009-1023
- ISSN
- 0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138074791
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › School Health and Nursing Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
- Keywords
- school-based drug prevention, adolescent drug use, prevention program effectiveness, program characteristics, booster sessions, peer-led intervention, community-based intervention, social influence model, life skills, mediators
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Humans, Peer Group, Preventive Health Services, Quality of Health Care, School Health Services, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
