Cited by 280EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form

Williams, Jessica·2001·System

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0346-251x(01)00022-7

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies by J. Williams (2001) and Loewen (2005) provide evidence that temporary shifts in attention happen with some frequency in task-based interactions and can lead to learning.

    “Studies by J. Williams (2001) and Loewen (2005) provide evidence that this happens with some frequency in task-based interactions and can lead to learning.”

    From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as J. Williams (2001)

  • The extent to which learners participate in and benefit from focus on form depends on their L2 proficiency, with higher proficiency learners focusing on form more and benefitting more from it than lower proficiency learners.

    “The extent to which learners participate in and benefit from focus on form depends on their L2 proficiency with higher proficiency learners focusing on form more and benefitting more from it than lower proficiency learners (J.Williams, 2001).”

    From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as J.Williams, 2001

  • The extent to which learners notice those forms that are focused on during communicative interactions varies according to factors such as whether the form receiving the focus is relevant to the learners' communicative needs and the discoursal characteristics of specific focus on form options, in particular their level of explicitness.

    “The extent to which learners notice those forms that are focussed on during communicative interactions varies according to a number of factors such as whether the form receiving the focus is relevant to the learners' communicative needs (J.Williams, 2001) and the discoursal characteristics of specific focus on form options, in particular their level of explicitness (Egi, 2007).”

    From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as J.Williams, 2001

  • Both focus on form initiated by learners in learner-learner interaction and by teachers in whole-class interaction benefit acquisition.

    “Both focus on form initiated by learners in learner-learner interaction and by teachers in whole-class interaction benefit acquisition (J.Williams, 2001;Loewen, 2005).”

    From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as J.Williams, 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, J.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Jessica
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-09
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
325-340
ISSN
0346-251X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991834502
Cited by
280
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 17
FWCI
41.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
System (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
attention to form, spontaneous attention, classroom interaction, proficiency level, learner roles, teacher role, second language acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review