The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies by J. Williams (2001) and Loewen (2005) provide evidence that temporary shifts in attention happen with some frequency in task-based interactions and can lead to learning.
“Studies by J. Williams (2001) and Loewen (2005) provide evidence that this happens with some frequency in task-based interactions and can lead to learning.”
From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as J. Williams (2001)
The extent to which learners participate in and benefit from focus on form depends on their L2 proficiency, with higher proficiency learners focusing on form more and benefitting more from it than lower proficiency learners.
“The extent to which learners participate in and benefit from focus on form depends on their L2 proficiency with higher proficiency learners focusing on form more and benefitting more from it than lower proficiency learners (J.Williams, 2001).”
From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as J.Williams, 2001
The extent to which learners notice those forms that are focused on during communicative interactions varies according to factors such as whether the form receiving the focus is relevant to the learners' communicative needs and the discoursal characteristics of specific focus on form options, in particular their level of explicitness.
“The extent to which learners notice those forms that are focussed on during communicative interactions varies according to a number of factors such as whether the form receiving the focus is relevant to the learners' communicative needs (J.Williams, 2001) and the discoursal characteristics of specific focus on form options, in particular their level of explicitness (Egi, 2007).”
From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as J.Williams, 2001
Both focus on form initiated by learners in learner-learner interaction and by teachers in whole-class interaction benefit acquisition.
“Both focus on form initiated by learners in learner-learner interaction and by teachers in whole-class interaction benefit acquisition (J.Williams, 2001;Loewen, 2005).”
From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as J.Williams, 2001
Cites
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 4,910 · see citing works
Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136 · Cited by 2,414 · see citing works
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263197001034 · Cited by 2,259 · see citing works
Long, M. (1991) · Studies in Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.2.07lon · Cited by 1,775 · see citing works
INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT: An Empirical Study of Question Formation in ESL
Mackey, A. (1999) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263199004027 · Cited by 772 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Focus on form: A critical review
Ellis, R. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816628627 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue
Leeser, M. J. (2004) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168804lr134oa · Cited by 419 · see citing works
INCIDENTAL FOCUS ON FORM AND SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING
Loewen, S. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050163 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Interaction and instructed second language acquisition
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000125 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Interactional feedback in learner-learner interactions in a task-based EFL classroom
Fujii, A., & Mackey, A. (2009) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral.2009.012 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
The Occurrence and Effectiveness of Spontaneous Focus on Form in Adult ESL Classrooms
Nassaji, H. (2010) · The Canadian Modern Language Review · doi:10.3138/cmlr.66.6.907 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
1. Peer interaction and learning: A focus on the silent learner
Fernández-Dobao, A. (2016) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.45.02fer · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Williams, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Williams, Jessica
- ORCID
- Williams, Jessica
- Venue
- System
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 325-340
- ISSN
- 0346-251X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991834502
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 41.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- System (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- attention to form, spontaneous attention, classroom interaction, proficiency level, learner roles, teacher role, second language acquisition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review