Cited by 75Dupuytren's Contracture and TreatmentsOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationCongenital limb and hand anomalies

Severe contractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint in Dupuytren's disease: Results of a prospective trial of operative correction and dynamic extension splinting

Rives, Karen, Gelberman, Richard, Smith, Beth, Carney, Karen·1992·The Journal of Hand Surgery

Abstract

In a prospective study, 23 proximal interphalangeal joints that were severely contracted (> or = 45 degrees) as a result of Dupuytren's disease underwent operative correction and 6 months of dynamic extension splinting. Proximal interphalangeal joint extension was measured preoperatively and postoperatively at 3-month intervals for 1 year and at 6-month intervals thereafter. Mean follow-up was 2 years (minimum, 1 year). Overall, at 2 years, 44% improvement in proximal interphalangeal joint extension was noted. Mean improvement of 59% in proximal interphalangeal joint extension was noted in patients who complied with the postoperative dynamic extension splinting program. Patients who were noncomplaint demonstrated a 25% improvement in proximal interphalangeal joint extension. The difference in values between patients who were compliant and those who were not was statistically significant. Other factors--severity of contracture, digit involved, and the necessity for capsular release--were not significantly related to outcome. This study suggests that soft tissue responds to continuous dynamic extension stresses and can be remodeled over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0363-5023(09)91084-x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between the number of logins and outcomes in e-therapies targeting physical health is similar to the positive relationship observed between session attendance and outcome in physical rehabilitation and to the dose-response curve seen in medication therapy.

    “The association between the number of logins and outcomes in e-therapies targeting physical health is similar to the positive relationship observed between session attendance and outcome in physical rehabilitation [67-70] and to the dose–response curve seen in medication therapy.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rives, K., Gelberman, R., Smith, B., & Carney, K.
Affiliations
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Gelberman, Richard
Venue
The Journal of Hand Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-11
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
1153-1159
ISSN
0363-5023 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118504363
Cited by
75
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal Of Hand Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Dupuytren's Contracture and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Congenital limb and hand anomalies
Keywords
Dupuytren's contracture, proximal interphalangeal joint contracture, operative correction, joint extension, soft tissue remodeling, capsular release
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Dupuytren Contracture, Female, Finger Joint, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Splints, Range of Motion, Articular, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review