The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An overview of KRL, a Knowledge Representation Language
Abstract
This paper describes KRL, a Knowledge Representation Language designed for use in understander systems. It outlines both the general concepts which underlie our research and the details of KRL-0, an experimental implementation of some of these concepts. KRL is an attempt to integrate procedural knowledge with a broad base of declarative forms. These forms provide a variety of ways to express the logical structure of the knowledge, in order to give flexibility in associating procedures (for memory and reasoning) with specific pieces of knowledge, and to control the relative accessibility of different facts and descriptions. The formalism for declarative knowledge is based on structured conceptual objects with associated descriptions. These objects form a network of memory units with several different sorts of linkages, each having well-specified implications for the retrieval process. Procedures can be associated directly with the internal structure of a conceptual object. This procedurul attachment allows the steps for a particular operation to be determined by characteristics of the specific entities involved. The control structure of KRL is based on the belief that the next generation of intelligent programs will integrate data-directed and goal-directed processing by using multiprocessing. It provides for a priority-ordered multiprocess agenda with explicit (user-provided) strategies for scheduling and resource allocation. It provides procedure directories which operate along with process frameworks to allow procedural parameterization of the fundamental system processes for building, comparing, and retrieving memory structures. Future development of KRL will include integrating procedure definition with the descriptive formalism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On data-limited and resource-limited processes
Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1975) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90004-3 · Cited by 2,403
Self-citation
Cited by
(1988) · Cited by 16,582
Building machines that learn and think like people
Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x16001837 · Cited by 2,550
(1990) · Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics · Cited by 1,059
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
(2024) · Encyclopedia of Computer Graphics and Games · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23161-2_300700 · Cited by 819
Deliberative and implemental mind-sets: Cognitive tuning toward congruous thoughts and information.
Gollwitzer, P. M., Heckhausen, H., & Steller, B. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1119 · Cited by 627
Metadata
- Authors
- BOBROW, D., & WINOGRAD, T.
- Venue
- Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1977-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-46
- ISSN
- 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157368609
- Cited by
- 922
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 59.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An overview of KRL, a Knowledge Representation Language. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0364-0213(77)80003-7
- The paper
- BOBROW, D., & WINOGRAD, T. (1977). An overview of KRL, a Knowledge Representation Language. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0364-0213(77)80003-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.