The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EPAM-like models of recognition and learning
Open accessAbstract
A description is provided of EPAM-III, a theory in the form of a computer program for simulating human verbal learning, along with a summary of the empirical evidence for its validity. Criticisms leveled against the theory in a recent paper by Barsalou and Bower are shown to derive largely from their misconception that EPAM-III employed a binary, rather than n-ary branching discrimination net. It is shown that Barsalou and Bower also failed to understand how the recursive structure of EPAM-III eliminates the need to duplicate test nodes that are used to recognize subobjects, and how the possibility of redundant recognition paths controls the sensitivity of EPAM to noticing order. EPAM is also compared briefly with other theories of human discrimination and discrimination learning, including PANDEMONIUM-like systems and dataflow nets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1 · Cited by 5,902
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
Lakatos, I. (1970) · Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171434.009 · Cited by 4,649
A simulation of memory for chess positions
Simon, H. A., & Gilmartin, K. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90024-8 · Cited by 439
Self-citation
Cited by
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01000103 · Cited by 3,091
Simon, H. A. (1990) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.000245 · Cited by 1,906
Self-citationChunking mechanisms in human learning
GOBET, F., LANE, P., CROKER, S., CHENG, P., JONES, G., OLIVER, I., & PINE, J. (2001) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01662-4 · Cited by 1,157
BIRCH: A New Data Clustering Algorithm and Its Applications
Zhang, T., Ramakrishnan, R., & Livny, M. (1997) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1023/a:1009783824328 · Cited by 888
Metadata
- Authors
- FEIGENBAUM, E., & SIMON, H.
- Venue
- Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 305-336
- ISSN
- 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070618299
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EPAM-like models of recognition and learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0364-0213(84)80005-1
- The paper
- FEIGENBAUM, E., & SIMON, H. (1984). EPAM-like models of recognition and learning. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0364-0213(84)80005-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
