The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interestingness?A neglected variable in discourse processing
Abstract
Symptomatic of a contemporary concern with affective factors in cognitive processing, a corpus of research is now emerging on the role of interestingness in discourse processing. This research has concentrated on narrative prose and has adopted a structural approach, arguing for the centrality of event and discourse structure in producing an affect like interest. The authors point out that this approach considers only one type of interest—knowledge‐triggered—to the exclusion of another important type—value‐triggered. A more comprehensive understanding of interest will only be achieved by researching other genres, such as exposition, and by considering the multiple sources of interest‐producing conditions. We suggest the notion of “informational significance” as an inclusive term, and underline the need for a process‐based understanding of interest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Effect of interest on attentional shift, recognition, and recall in young children
Renninger, K. A., & Wozniak, R. H. (1985) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.21.4.624 · Cited by 279
Cited by
Motivational beliefs, values, and goals
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153 · Cited by 7,587
The four-phase model of interest development
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4 · Cited by 4,702
Self-citationMotivating the Academically Unmotivated: A Critical Issue for the 21st Century
Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543070002151 · Cited by 1,689
Self-citationInterest, Learning, and Motivation
Schiefele, U. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653136 · Cited by 1,444
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.562 · Cited by 921
Metadata
- Authors
- HIDI, S., & BAIRD, W.
- Venue
- Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-194
- ISSN
- 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085834436
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 151.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interestingness?A neglected variable in discourse processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0364-0213(86)80003-9
- The paper
- HIDI, S., & BAIRD, W. (1986). Interestingness?A neglected variable in discourse processing. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0364-0213(86)80003-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.