The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A taxonomy of part-whole relations
Open accessAbstract
A taxonomy of part-whole or meronymic relations is developed to explain the ordinary English-speaker's use of the term “part of” and its cognates. The resulting classification yields six types of meronymic relations: 1. component-integral object (pedal-bike), 2. member-collection (ship-fleet), 3. portion-mass (slice-pie), 4. stuff-object (steel-car), 5. feature-activity (paying-shopping), and 6. place-area (Everglades-Florida). Meronymic relations ore further distinguished from other inclusion relations, such as spatial inclusion, and class inclusion, and from several other semantic relations: attribution, attachment, and ownership. This taxonomy is then used to explain cases of apparent intransitivity in merological syllogisms, and standard form syllogisms whose premises express different inclusion relations. The data suggest that intransitivities arise due to equivocations between different types of semantic relations. These results are then explained by means of the relation element theory which accounts for the character and behavior of semantic relations in terms of more primitive relational elements. The inferential phenomena observed are then explained by means of a single principle of element matching.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Cited by
The Sequence Ontology: a tool for the unification of genome annotations
Eilbeck, K., Lewis, S. E., Mungall, C. J., Yandell, M., Stein, L., Durbin, R., & Ashburner, M. (2005) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-r44 · Cited by 806
Construction of engineering ontologies for knowledge sharing and reuse
Borst, W. N. (2025) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036509886 · Cited by 688
Construction area (no hard hat required)
Bennett, K. (2011) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-011-9703-8 · Cited by 252
Isolated and interrelated concepts
Goldstone, R. L. (1996) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03201087 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- WINSTON, M., CHAFFIN, R., & HERRMANN, D.
- Venue
- Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 417-444
- ISSN
- 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078288474
- Cited by
- 966
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A taxonomy of part-whole relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0364-0213(87)80015-0
- The paper
- WINSTON, M., CHAFFIN, R., & HERRMANN, D. (1987). A taxonomy of part-whole relations. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0364-0213(87)80015-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.