The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Construction of engineering ontologies for knowledge sharing and reuse
Open accessAbstract
This thesis describes an investigation into the practical use of ontologies for the development of information systems. Ontologies are formal descriptions of shared knowledge in a domain. An ontology can be used as a specification of an information system because it specifies the knowledge that is required for the tasks the information system has to perform. Sharing and reuse of ontologies across different domains and applications can therefore improve information systems design. Ontologies have been a subject for a lot of research carried out in the artificial intelligence community. Although many ontologies have been developed, they fail to demonstrate that ontologies for large and complex domains can be developed that can be used and reused across different applications. There are three reasons for this: (i) many ontologies have not been used to develop a real-life application, (ii) many ontologies have not been reused for different applications in different domains and (iii)many ontologies are merely taxonomies of domain concepts and fail to capture meta-level and tacit background knowledge. As a result, the question whether ontologies can be used and reused for different real-life applications remains open. The aim of our research has therefore been to find the answer to this question.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Cited by 21,711
Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing?
Gruber, T. R. (1995) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081 · Cited by 7,753
Stroustrup, B. (1985) · Cited by 3,940
Newell, A. (1982) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(82)90012-1 · Cited by 2,589
Forbus, K. D. (1984) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(84)90038-9 · Cited by 2,013
Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation
Guarino, N. (1995) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1066 · Cited by 1,197
Steele, G. L. (1984) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 1,162
Analysis patterns: reusable objects models
Fowler, M. (1996) · Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks · Cited by 1,062
A taxonomy of part-whole relations
WINSTON, M., CHAFFIN, R., & HERRMANN, D. (1987) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(87)80015-0 · Cited by 966
Revised report on the algorithmic language ALGOL 60
Backus, J. W., Bauer, F. L., Green, J., Katz, C., McCarthy, J., Perlis, A. J., Rutishauser, H., Samelson, K., Vauquois, B., Wegstein, J. H., et al. (1963) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/366193.366201 · Cited by 900
Cited by
Data construction method for the applications of workshop digital twin system
Kong, T., Hu, T., Zhou, T., & Ye, Y. (2021) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.02.003 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Borst, W. N.
- Published
- 1997-09-05
- OpenAlex
- W2140923664
- Cited by
- 688
- References
- 22
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Construction of engineering ontologies for knowledge sharing and reuse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3990/1.9789036509886
- The paper
- Borst, W. N. (2025). Construction of engineering ontologies for knowledge sharing and reuse. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036509886
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.