The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical market crashes
Open accessAbstract
This review is a partial synthesis of the book ``Why stock market crash'' (Princeton University Press, January 2003), which presents a general theory of financial crashes and of stock market instabilities that his co-workers and the author have developed over the past seven years. The study of the frequency distribution of drawdowns, or runs of successive losses shows that large financial crashes are ``outliers'': they form a class of their own as can be seen from their statistical signatures. If large financial crashes are ``outliers'', they are special and thus require a special explanation, a specific model, a theory of their own. In addition, their special properties may perhaps be used for their prediction. The main mechanisms leading to positive feedbacks, i.e., self-reinforcement, such as imitative behavior and herding between investors are reviewed with many references provided to the relevant literature outside the confine of Physics. Positive feedbacks provide the fuel for the development of speculative bubbles, preparing the instability for a major crash. We demonstrate several detailed mathematical models of speculative bubbles and crashes. The most important message is the discovery of robust and universal signatures of the approach to crashes. These precursory patterns have been documented for essentially all crashes on developed as well as emergent stock markets, on currency markets, on company stocks, and so on. The concept of an ``anti-bubble'' is also summarized, with two forward predictions on the Japanese stock market starting in 1999 and on the USA stock market still running. We conclude by presenting our view of the organization of financial markets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FAMA, E. F. (1991) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.x · Cited by 5,350
Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C., & Mikosch, T. (1997) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33483-2 · Cited by 4,402
Punctuated equilibrium comes of age
Gould, S. J., & Eldredge, N. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/366223a0 · Cited by 957
Wolfram, & Gad-el-Hak (2003) · Applied Mechanics Reviews · doi:10.1115/1.1553433 · Cited by 760
Cited by
Physical approach to complex systems
Kwapień, J., & Drożdż, S. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.007 · Cited by 517
Multifractal analysis of financial markets: a review
Jiang, Z.-Q., Xie, W.-J., Zhou, W.-X., & Sornette, D. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab42fb · Cited by 423
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sornette, D.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 378
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-98
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056046055
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical market crashes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00634-8
- The paper
- Sornette, D. (2003). Critical market crashes. Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00634-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.