Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 513

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum field theory in the large N limit: a review

Open access
Moshe, Moshe, Zinn-Justin, Jean·2003·Physics Reports

Abstract

Abstract We review the solutions of O ( N ) and U ( N ) quantum field theories in the large N limit and as 1/ N expansions, in the case of vector representations. Since invariant composite fields have small fluctuations for large N , the method relies on constructing effective field theories for composite fields after integration over the original degrees of freedom. We first solve a general scalar U ( φ 2 ) field theory for N large and discuss various non-perturbative physical issues such as critical behaviour. We show how large N results can also be obtained from variational calculations. We illustrate these ideas by showing that the large N expansion allows to relate the ( φ 2 ) 2 theory and the non-linear σ -model, models which are renormalizable in different dimensions. Similarly, a relation between CP ( N −1) and abelian Higgs models is exhibited. Large N techniques also allow solving self-interacting fermion models. A relation between the Gross–Neveu, a theory with a four-fermi self-interaction, and a Yukawa-type theory renormalizable in four dimensions then follows. We discuss dissipative dynamics, which is relevant to the approach to equilibrium, and which in some formulation exhibits quantum mechanics supersymmetry. This also serves as an introduction to the study of the 3D supersymmetric quantum field theory. Large N methods are useful in problems that involve a crossover between different dimensions. We thus briefly discuss finite size effects, finite temperature scalar and supersymmetric field theories. We also use large N methods to investigate the weakly interacting Bose gas. The solution of the general scalar U ( φ 2 ) field theory is then applied to other issues like tricritical behaviour and double scaling limit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0370-1573(03)00263-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 513

Metadata

Authors
Moshe, M., & Zinn-Justin, J.
Venue
Physics Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-10
Volume
385
Issue
3-6
Pages
69-228
ISSN
0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034732344
Cited by
513
References
1
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum field theory in the large N limit: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0370-1573(03)00263-1
The paper
Moshe, M., & Zinn-Justin, J. (2003). Quantum field theory in the large N limit: a review. Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-1573(03)00263-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.