The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum field theory in the large N limit: a review
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We review the solutions of O ( N ) and U ( N ) quantum field theories in the large N limit and as 1/ N expansions, in the case of vector representations. Since invariant composite fields have small fluctuations for large N , the method relies on constructing effective field theories for composite fields after integration over the original degrees of freedom. We first solve a general scalar U ( φ 2 ) field theory for N large and discuss various non-perturbative physical issues such as critical behaviour. We show how large N results can also be obtained from variational calculations. We illustrate these ideas by showing that the large N expansion allows to relate the ( φ 2 ) 2 theory and the non-linear σ -model, models which are renormalizable in different dimensions. Similarly, a relation between CP ( N −1) and abelian Higgs models is exhibited. Large N techniques also allow solving self-interacting fermion models. A relation between the Gross–Neveu, a theory with a four-fermi self-interaction, and a Yukawa-type theory renormalizable in four dimensions then follows. We discuss dissipative dynamics, which is relevant to the approach to equilibrium, and which in some formulation exhibits quantum mechanics supersymmetry. This also serves as an introduction to the study of the 3D supersymmetric quantum field theory. Large N methods are useful in problems that involve a crossover between different dimensions. We thus briefly discuss finite size effects, finite temperature scalar and supersymmetric field theories. We also use large N methods to investigate the weakly interacting Bose gas. The solution of the general scalar U ( φ 2 ) field theory is then applied to other issues like tricritical behaviour and double scaling limit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phase transitions in quantum chromodynamics
Meyer-Ortmanns, H. (1996) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.68.473 · Cited by 161
Cited by
The conformal bootstrap: Theory, numerical techniques, and applications
Poland, D., Rychkov, S., & Vichi, A. (2019) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.015002 · Cited by 760
The nonperturbative functional renormalization group and its applications
Dupuis, N., Canet, L., Eichhorn, A., Metzner, W., Pawlowski, J. M., Tissier, M., & Wschebor, N. (2021) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.01.001 · Cited by 660
Uncolored random tensors, melon diagrams, and the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models
Klebanov, I. R., & Tarnopolsky, G. (2017) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.046004 · Cited by 336
d = 3 bosonic vector models coupled to Chern-Simons gauge theories
Aharony, O., Gur-Ari, G., & Yacoby, R. (2012) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2012)037 · Cited by 275
Casimir energy and modularity in higher-dimensional conformal field theories
Luo, C., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2023)028 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Moshe, M., & Zinn-Justin, J.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 385
- Issue
- 3-6
- Pages
- 69-228
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034732344
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum field theory in the large N limit: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0370-1573(03)00263-1
- The paper
- Moshe, M., & Zinn-Justin, J. (2003). Quantum field theory in the large N limit: a review. Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-1573(03)00263-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.