Cited by 484

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Black holes on the brane

Dadhich, Naresh, Maartens, Roy, Papadopoulos, Philippos, Rezania, Vahid·2000·Physics Letters B

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00798-x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The tidal black holes resemble black-hole monopoles, but with negative square monopole charge P^2.

    “The tidal black holes, for example, resemble black-hole monopoles, but with negative square monopole charge P 2 .”

    From Vacuum metastability with black holes (2015) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Introduction describes a tidal black hole with the mathematical form of a Reissner–Nordström solution, and Section IV says negative tidal charge is the physically more natural case. Our copy does not compare it to a black-hole monopole or identify its charge as a negative square monopole charge P²; Section III instead calls the parameter q a tidal charge. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 429 (1998) 263; I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 436 (1998) 257. · DOI · Paper page
  2. L. Randall, R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370; 4690. · DOI · Paper page
  3. K. Akama, hep-th/0001113 (reproduced from 1982 article); V.A. Rubakov, M.E. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. 125B (1983) 139; M. Visser, Phys. Lett. B 159 (1985) 22; M. Gogberashvili, Europhys. Lett. 49 (2000) 396. · arXiv
  4. Chamblin, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 61, 065007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.065007 · DOI · Paper page
  5. P.C. Argyres, S. Dimopoulos, J. March-Russell, Phys. Lett. B 441 (1998) 96; P. Kraus, JHEP 9912 (1999) 011; J. Garriga, M. Sasaki, hep-th/9912118; A. Chamblin, C. Csaki, J. Erlich, T.J. Hollowood, hep-th/0002076; R. Emparan, G.T. Horowitz, R.C. Myers, hep-th/0003118; S. Nojiri, O. Obregon, S.D. Odintsov, S. Ogushi, hep-th/0003148; R. Casadio, B. Harms, hep-th/0004004. · arXiv
  6. S.B. Giddings, E. Katz, L. Randall, JHEP 0003 (2000) 023; J. Garriga, T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 2778. · DOI
  7. Emparan, 2000, JHEP, 0001, 007, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/007 · DOI · Paper page
  8. C. Csaki, J. Erlich, T.J. Hollowood, Y. Shirman, hep-th/0001033. · arXiv
  9. T. Shiromizu, K. Maeda, M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D, to appear (2000), gr-qc/9910076. · arXiv
  10. Binetruy, 2000, Phys. Lett. B, 477, 285, 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00204-5 · DOI
  11. R. Maartens, Phys. Rev. D, to appear (2000), hep-th/0004166. · arXiv
  12. R. Maartens, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 463; R. Maartens, B.A. Bassett, Class. Quantum Grav. 15 (1998) 705. · DOI
  13. Sasaki, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 62, 024008, 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.024008 · DOI · Paper page
  14. D. Vollick, hep-th/0004064. · arXiv
  15. S. Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes, Oxford University Press, 1983. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dadhich, N., Maartens, R., Papadopoulos, P., & Rezania, V.
Venue
Physics Letters B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-08
Volume
487
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-6
ISSN
0370-2693
Cited by
484
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review