Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gravity, stability, and energy conservation on the Randall-Sundrum brane world

Sasaki, Misao, Shiromizu, Tetsuya, Maeda, Kei-ichi·2000·Physical Review D

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.62.024008

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although the extra bulk spatial dimension becomes infinite in extent, higher-dimensional gravity becomes localized on the brane nonetheless.

    “although the extra bulk spatial dimension becomes infinite in extent, the higher-dimensional gravity becomes localized on the brane nonetheless.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [323]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. L. Randall, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 3370, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3370 · DOI · Paper page
  2. L. Randall, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 4690, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4690 · DOI · Paper page
  3. A. Chamblin, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 61, 065007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.065007 · DOI · Paper page
  4. R. Emparan, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 01, 007, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/007 · DOI · Paper page
  5. M. Banados, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 61, 081901, 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.081901 · DOI
  6. P. Binetruy, 1999, Acta Phys. Pol. B, B30, 3541
  7. S. Mukohyama, 2000, Phys. Lett. B, 473, 241, 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01505-1 · DOI
  8. P. Kraus, 1999, J. High Energy Phys., 12, 011, 10.1088/1126-6708/1999/12/011 · DOI
  9. C. Csaki, 1999, Phys. Lett. B, 462, 34, 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00896-5 · DOI
  10. J. M. Cline, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 4245, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4245 · DOI
  11. P. Kanti, 1999, Phys. Lett. B, 468, 31, 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01218-6 · DOI
  12. V. A. Rubakov, 1983, Phys. Lett., 152B, 136, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)91253-4 · DOI · Paper page
  13. M. Visser, 1985, Phys. Lett., 22, 10.1016/0370-2693(85)90112-1 · DOI
  14. K. Akama, 1987, Prog. Theor. Phys., 78, 184, 10.1143/PTP.78.184 · DOI
  15. M. Gogberashvili, 1999, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 14, 2025, 10.1142/S021773239900208X · DOI
  16. M. Cvetic, 1997, Phys. Rep., 282, 159, 10.1016/S0370-1573(96)00035-X · DOI
  17. P. Horava, 1996, Nucl. Phys., B475, 94, 10.1016/0550-3213(96)00308-2 · DOI · Paper page
  18. J. Polchinski, 1998, String Theory I & II
  19. A. Ashtekar, 1978, J. Math. Phys., 19, 1542, 10.1063/1.523863 · DOI
  20. U. Gen, 1998, J. Math. Phys., 39, 6573, 10.1063/1.532666 · DOI
  21. U. Gen, 1999, J. Math. Phys., 40, 2021, 10.1063/1.532848 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sasaki, M., Shiromizu, T., & Maeda, K.-I.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2000-06-14
Volume
62
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2821
  • 1089-4918
Cited by
209
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review