The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of cosmological moduli fields on cosmic microwave background
Open accessAbstract
We discuss effects of cosmological moduli fields on the cosmic microwave background (CMB). If a modulus field φ once dominates the universe, the CMB we observe today is from the decay of φ and its anisotropy is affected by the primordial fluctuation in the amplitude of the modulus field. Consequently, constraints on the inflaton potential from the CMB anisotropy can be relaxed. In particular, the scale of the inflation may be significantly lowered. In addition, with the cosmological moduli fields, correlated mixture of adiabatic and isocurvature fluctuations may be generated, which results in enhanced CMB angular power spectrum at higher multipoles relative to that of lower ones. Such an enhancement can be an evidence of the cosmological moduli fields, and may be observed in future satellite experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“We now see that the metric is of the Kantowski-Sachs form (case 2 of [43]), a Bianchi type III homogeneous but anisotropic geometry.”
From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [43]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Coughlan, 1983, Phys. Lett. B, 131, 59, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)91091-2 · DOI
- Dine, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 398, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.398 · DOI
- Dine, 1996, Nucl. Phys. B, 458, 291, 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00538-2 · DOI
- Moroi, 1995, Phys. Lett. B, 342, 105, 10.1016/0370-2693(94)01337-C · DOI
- Kawasaki, 1996, Phys. Lett. B, 370, 52, 10.1016/0370-2693(95)01546-9 · DOI
- Moroi, 2000, Nucl. Phys. B, 570, 455, 10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00748-8 · DOI
- Randall, 1999, Nucl. Phys. B, 557, 79, 10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00359-4 · DOI
- Giudice, 1998, JHEP, 9812, 027, 10.1088/1126-6708/1998/12/027 · DOI
- Bagger, 2000, JHEP, 04, 009, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/04/009 · DOI
- Gordon, 2001, Phys. Rev. D, 63, 023506, 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.023506 · DOI · Paper page
- Langlois, 1999, Phys. Rev. D, 59, 123512, 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.123512 · DOI · Paper page
- Bartolo, 2001, Phys. Rev. D, 64, 083514, 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.083514 · DOI
- Bardeen, 1983, Phys. Rev. D, 28, 629, 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.629 · DOI
- Mollerach, 1990, Phys. Rev. D, 42, 313, 10.1103/PhysRevD.42.313 · DOI
- Affleck, 1985, Nucl. Phys. B, 249, 361, 10.1016/0550-3213(85)90021-5 · DOI
- Langlois, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 62, 043504, 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.043504 · DOI
- Bond, 2000, Astrophys. J., 533, 19, 10.1086/308625 · DOI
- Bennett, 1996, Astrophys. J. Lett., 464, L1, 10.1086/310075 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
FIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Limon, M., Page, L., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/330 · Cited by 5,786
Dunkley, J., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Spergel, D. N., Larson, D., Hinshaw, G., Page, L., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Jarosik, N., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/306 · Cited by 1,787
Qiu, T., Evslin, J., Cai, Y.-F., Li, M., & Zhang, X. (2011) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/10/036 · Cited by 206
Review of Local Non‐Gaussianity from Multifield Inflation
Byrnes, C. T., & Choi, K.-Y. (2010) · Advances in Astronomy · doi:10.1155/2010/724525 · Cited by 178
Conditions for large non-Gaussianity in two-field slow-roll inflation
Byrnes, C. T., Choi, K.-Y., & Hall, L. M. H. (2008) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/10/008 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Moroi, T., & Takahashi, T.
- Affiliations
- Tohoku University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Moroi, Takeo
- ORCID
- Takahashi, Tomo
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 522
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 215-221
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075454621
- Cited by
- 938
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 61
- FWCI
- 21.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physics Letters B (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (12047201, 13740138)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- cosmic microwave background anisotropies, primordial perturbations, CMB power spectrum, scalar field decay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review