FIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Open accessAbstract
The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) 5-year data provide stringent limits on deviations from the minimal, six-parameter Λ cold dark matter model. We report these limits and use them to constrain the physics of cosmic inflation via Gaussianity, adiabaticity, the power spectrum of primordial fluctuations, gravitational waves, and spatial curvature. We also constrain models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating interaction, and neutrino properties, such as mass and the number of species. We detect no convincing deviations from the minimal model. The six parameters and the corresponding 68% uncertainties, derived from the WMAP data combined with the distance measurements from the Type Ia supernovae (SN) and the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) in the distribution of galaxies, are: Ω b h 2 = 0.02267 +0.00058 −0.00059 , Ω c h 2 = 0.1131 ± 0.0034, Ω Λ = 0.726 ± 0.015, n s = 0.960 ± 0.013, τ = 0.084 ± 0.016, and at k = 0.002 Mpc -1 . From these, we derive σ 8 = 0.812 ± 0.026, H 0 = 70.5 ± 1.3 km s -1 Mpc −1 , Ω b = 0.0456 ± 0.0015, Ω c = 0.228 ± 0.013, Ω m h 2 = 0.1358 +0.0037 −0.0036 , z reion = 10.9 ± 1.4, and t 0 = 13.72 ± 0.12 Gyr. With the WMAP data combined with BAO and SN, we find the limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio of r < 0.22(95%CL), and that n s > 1 is disfavored even when gravitational waves are included, which constrains the models of inflation that can produce significant gravitational waves, such as chaotic or power-law inflation models, or a blue spectrum, such as hybrid inflation models. We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: −0.14 < 1 + w < 0.12(95%CL) and −0.0179 < Ω k < 0.0081(95%CL). We provide a set of " WMAP distance priors," to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature. We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as −0.33 < 1 + w 0 < 0.21 (95% CL). Temperature and dark matter fluctuations are found to obey the adiabatic relation to within 8.9% and 2.1% for the axion-type and curvaton-type dark matter, respectively. The power spectra of TB and EB correlations constrain a parity-violating interaction, which rotates the polarization angle and converts E to B. The polarization angle could not be rotated more than −5 9 < Δα < 2 4 (95% CL) between the decoupling and the present epoch. We find the limit on the total mass of massive neutrinos of ∑ m ν < 0.67 eV(95%CL), which is free from the uncertainty in the normalization of the large-scale structure data. The number of relativistic degrees of freedom (dof), expressed in units of the effective number of neutrino species, is constrained as N eff = 4.4 ± 1.5 (68%), consistent with the standard value of 3.04. Finally, quantitative limits on physically-motivated primordial non-Gaussianity parameters are −9 < f local NL < 111 (95% CL) and −151 < f equil NL < 253 (95% CL) for the local and equilateral models, respectively.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Current cosmological models need both dark matter and dark energy to fit observational constraints.
“Current models of cosmology require the existence of both dark matter and dark energy to match observational constraints”
From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Komatsu et al. 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 550 · Cited by 5,786
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- Alabidi, L., & Lyth, D. H. 2006a, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP08(2006)013 · DOI
- Alabidi, L., & Lyth, D. H. 2006b, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP05(2006)016 · DOI
- Chen, X. 2005a, J. High Energy Phys., JHEP08(2005)045 · DOI
- Chen, X., Easther, R., & Lim, E. A. 2007a, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP06(2007)023 · DOI
- Chen, X., Easther, R., & Lim, E. A. 2008, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP04(2008)010 · DOI
- Creminelli, P., & Senatore, L. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP11(2007)010 · DOI
- Dimopoulos, S., Kachru, S., McGreevy, J., & Wacker, J. 2005, arXiv:hep-th/0507205 · arXiv
- Dunkley, J., et al. 2008, arXiv:0811.4280 · arXiv
- Easther, R., & McAllister, L. 2006, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP05(2006)018 · DOI
- Easther, R., & Peiris, H. 2006, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP09(2006)010 · DOI
- Elgarøy, Ø., & Lahav, O. 2003, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP04(2003)004 · DOI
- Hannestad, S. 2006a, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP01(2006)001 · DOI
- Hannestad, S., & Raffelt, G. 2004, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP04(2004)008 · DOI
- Hannestad, S., & Raffelt, G. G. 2006, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP11(2006)016 · DOI
- Hannestad, S., & Wong, Y. Y. Y. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP07(2007)004 · DOI
- Ichikawa, K., Kawasaki, M., & Takahashi, F. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP05(2007)007 · DOI
- Koyama, K., & Maartens, R. 2006, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP01(2006)016 · DOI
- Koyama, K., & Wands, D. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP04(2007)008 · DOI
- Lepora, N. F. 1998, arXiv:gr-gc 9812077
- Li, M., Lin, C., Wang, T., & Wang, Y. 2008b, arXiv:0805.1299 · arXiv
- Li, M., Wang, T., & Wang, Y. 2008, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP03(2008)028 · DOI
- Moss, I. G., & Graham, C. M. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP11(2007)004 · DOI
- Moss, I. G., & Xiong, C. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP04(2007)007 · DOI
- Naselsky, P. D., Christensen, P. R., Coles, P., Verkhodanov, O., Novikov, D., & Kim, J. 2007, arXiv:0712.1118 · arXiv
- Peiris, H., & Easther, R. 2006a, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP07(2006)002 · DOI
- Peiris, H., & Easther, R. 2006b, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP10(2006)017 · DOI
- Seery, D., & Lidsey, J. E. 2005, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP06(2005)003 · DOI · Paper page
- Seery, D., & Lidsey, J. E. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP01(2007)008 · DOI · Paper page
- Seery, D., Lidsey, J. E., & Sloth, M. S. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP01(2007)027 · DOI
- Smith, K. M., & Zaldarriaga, M. 2006, arXiv:astro-ph/0612571 · arXiv
- Weinberg, S. 2008, Cosmology (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press)
- Authors
- Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Limon, M., Page, L., Spergel, D. N., Halpern, M., Hill, R. S., Kogut, A., Meyer, S. S., Tucker, G. S., Weiland, J. L., Wollack, E., & Wright, E. L.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Adnet Systems (United States) (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Brown University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Komatsu, E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2009-02-01
- Volume
- 180
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 330-376
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2160253850
- Cited by
- 5,786
- References
- 550
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 132 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 122 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 165 · 2016: 314 · 2015: 198 · 2014: 266 · 2013: 429 · 2012: 557
- FWCI
- 545.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Princeton University
- Goddard Space Flight Center
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- WMAP 5-year data, cosmic microwave background anisotropies, cosmic inflation, primordial power spectrum, primordial gravitational waves, tensor-to-scalar ratio, dark energy equation of state, neutrino mass, spatial curvature, cosmic reionization, Hubble constant, matter density parameter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review