Cited by 5,786Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

FIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION

Open access
Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D. +11 more·2009·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) 5-year data provide stringent limits on deviations from the minimal, six-parameter Λ cold dark matter model. We report these limits and use them to constrain the physics of cosmic inflation via Gaussianity, adiabaticity, the power spectrum of primordial fluctuations, gravitational waves, and spatial curvature. We also constrain models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating interaction, and neutrino properties, such as mass and the number of species. We detect no convincing deviations from the minimal model. The six parameters and the corresponding 68% uncertainties, derived from the WMAP data combined with the distance measurements from the Type Ia supernovae (SN) and the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) in the distribution of galaxies, are: Ω b h 2 = 0.02267 +0.00058 −0.00059 , Ω c h 2 = 0.1131 ± 0.0034, Ω Λ = 0.726 ± 0.015, n s = 0.960 ± 0.013, τ = 0.084 ± 0.016, and at k = 0.002 Mpc -1 . From these, we derive σ 8 = 0.812 ± 0.026, H 0 = 70.5 ± 1.3 km s -1 Mpc −1 , Ω b = 0.0456 ± 0.0015, Ω c = 0.228 ± 0.013, Ω m h 2 = 0.1358 +0.0037 −0.0036 , z reion = 10.9 ± 1.4, and t 0 = 13.72 ± 0.12 Gyr. With the WMAP data combined with BAO and SN, we find the limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio of r < 0.22(95%CL), and that n s > 1 is disfavored even when gravitational waves are included, which constrains the models of inflation that can produce significant gravitational waves, such as chaotic or power-law inflation models, or a blue spectrum, such as hybrid inflation models. We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: −0.14 < 1 + w < 0.12(95%CL) and −0.0179 < Ω k < 0.0081(95%CL). We provide a set of " WMAP distance priors," to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature. We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as −0.33 < 1 + w 0 < 0.21 (95% CL). Temperature and dark matter fluctuations are found to obey the adiabatic relation to within 8.9% and 2.1% for the axion-type and curvaton-type dark matter, respectively. The power spectra of TB and EB correlations constrain a parity-violating interaction, which rotates the polarization angle and converts E to B. The polarization angle could not be rotated more than −5 9 < Δα < 2 4 (95% CL) between the decoupling and the present epoch. We find the limit on the total mass of massive neutrinos of ∑ m ν < 0.67 eV(95%CL), which is free from the uncertainty in the normalization of the large-scale structure data. The number of relativistic degrees of freedom (dof), expressed in units of the effective number of neutrino species, is constrained as N eff = 4.4 ± 1.5 (68%), consistent with the standard value of 3.04. Finally, quantitative limits on physically-motivated primordial non-Gaussianity parameters are −9 < f local NL < 111 (95% CL) and −151 < f equil NL < 253 (95% CL) for the local and equilateral models, respectively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/330

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 550 · Cited by 5,786

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Alabidi, L., & Lyth, D. H. 2006a, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP08(2006)013 · DOI
  2. Alabidi, L., & Lyth, D. H. 2006b, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP05(2006)016 · DOI
  3. Chen, X. 2005a, J. High Energy Phys., JHEP08(2005)045 · DOI
  4. Chen, X., Easther, R., & Lim, E. A. 2007a, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP06(2007)023 · DOI
  5. Chen, X., Easther, R., & Lim, E. A. 2008, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP04(2008)010 · DOI
  6. Creminelli, P., & Senatore, L. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP11(2007)010 · DOI
  7. Dimopoulos, S., Kachru, S., McGreevy, J., & Wacker, J. 2005, arXiv:hep-th/0507205 · arXiv
  8. Dunkley, J., et al. 2008, arXiv:0811.4280 · arXiv
  9. Easther, R., & McAllister, L. 2006, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP05(2006)018 · DOI
  10. Easther, R., & Peiris, H. 2006, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP09(2006)010 · DOI
  11. Elgarøy, Ø., & Lahav, O. 2003, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP04(2003)004 · DOI
  12. Hannestad, S. 2006a, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP01(2006)001 · DOI
  13. Hannestad, S., & Raffelt, G. 2004, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP04(2004)008 · DOI
  14. Hannestad, S., & Raffelt, G. G. 2006, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP11(2006)016 · DOI
  15. Hannestad, S., & Wong, Y. Y. Y. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP07(2007)004 · DOI
  16. Ichikawa, K., Kawasaki, M., & Takahashi, F. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP05(2007)007 · DOI
  17. Koyama, K., & Maartens, R. 2006, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP01(2006)016 · DOI
  18. Koyama, K., & Wands, D. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP04(2007)008 · DOI
  19. Lepora, N. F. 1998, arXiv:gr-gc 9812077
  20. Li, M., Lin, C., Wang, T., & Wang, Y. 2008b, arXiv:0805.1299 · arXiv
  21. Li, M., Wang, T., & Wang, Y. 2008, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP03(2008)028 · DOI
  22. Moss, I. G., & Graham, C. M. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP11(2007)004 · DOI
  23. Moss, I. G., & Xiong, C. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP04(2007)007 · DOI
  24. Naselsky, P. D., Christensen, P. R., Coles, P., Verkhodanov, O., Novikov, D., & Kim, J. 2007, arXiv:0712.1118 · arXiv
  25. Peiris, H., & Easther, R. 2006a, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP07(2006)002 · DOI
  26. Peiris, H., & Easther, R. 2006b, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP10(2006)017 · DOI
  27. Seery, D., & Lidsey, J. E. 2005, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP06(2005)003 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Seery, D., & Lidsey, J. E. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP01(2007)008 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Seery, D., Lidsey, J. E., & Sloth, M. S. 2007, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., JCAP01(2007)027 · DOI
  30. Smith, K. M., & Zaldarriaga, M. 2006, arXiv:astro-ph/0612571 · arXiv
  31. Weinberg, S. 2008, Cosmology (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press)

Authors
Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Limon, M., Page, L., Spergel, D. N., Halpern, M., Hill, R. S., Kogut, A., Meyer, S. S., Tucker, G. S., Weiland, J. L., Wollack, E., & Wright, E. L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Adnet Systems (United States) (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Komatsu, E.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2009-02-01
Volume
180
Issue
2
Pages
330-376
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W2160253850
Cited by
5,786
References
550
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 132 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 122 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 165 · 2016: 314 · 2015: 198 · 2014: 266 · 2013: 429 · 2012: 557
FWCI
545.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Princeton University
  • Goddard Space Flight Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
WMAP 5-year data, cosmic microwave background anisotropies, cosmic inflation, primordial power spectrum, primordial gravitational waves, tensor-to-scalar ratio, dark energy equation of state, neutrino mass, spatial curvature, cosmic reionization, Hubble constant, matter density parameter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review