The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Analytic Hierarchy Process
SAATY, T. L., & KEARNS, K. P. (1985) · Analytical Planning · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-032599-6.50008-8 · Cited by 15,357
Multiple Attribute Decision Making
Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981) · Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9 · Cited by 8,526
Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.
Tsoukias, A., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1994) · The Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2584151 · Cited by 8,370
Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
Chen, S.-J. J., Hwang, C. L., Beckmann, M. J., & Krelle, W. E. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,207
What is the Analytic Hierarchy Process?
Saaty, T. L. (1988) · Mathematical Models for Decision Support · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-83555-1_5 · Cited by 1,492
Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method
Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., & Siskos, J. (1982) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(82)90155-2 · Cited by 1,089
On a short-coming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies
Belton, V., & Gear, T. E. (1983) · Omega · doi:10.1016/0305-0483(83)90047-6 · Cited by 936
An evidential reasoning approach for multiple-attribute decision making with uncertainty
Yang, J.-B., & Singh, M. G. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.259681 · Cited by 781
Self-citationOperations research : applications and algorithms
Winston, W. L. (1994) · Cited by 638
A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice
Stewart, T. (1992) · Omega · doi:10.1016/0305-0483(92)90003-p · Cited by 619
Cited by
Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making
Pang, Q., Wang, H., & Xu, Z. (2016) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.021 · Cited by 1,289
Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination
Yang, J.-B., & Xu, D.-L. (2013) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2013.09.003 · Cited by 719
Self-citationWang, Y.-M., Yang, J.-B., Xu, D.-L., & Chin, K.-S. (2006) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.03.034 · Cited by 267
Self-citationAdvanced uncertainty modelling for container port risk analysis
Alyami, H., Yang, Z., Riahi, R., Bonsall, S., & Wang, J. (2019) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.007 · Cited by 156
XAI-based Clinical Decision Support System: A Systematic Review
Kim, S., Kim, D., Kim, M., Ko, H., & Jeong, O. (2024) · doi:10.20944/preprints202406.0721.v1 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, J.-B.
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-61
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109034551
- Cited by
- 768
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 13.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00441-5
- The paper
- Yang, J.-B. (2001). Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00441-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
