Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 717

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests

Hartley, Mitschka J.·2002·Forest Ecology and Management
DOI 10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00549-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00549-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 100

  1. Allen, 1995, Biodiversity in New Zealand plantations, New Zealand For., 39, 26
  2. Assmann, E., 1970. The Principles of Forest Yield Study. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 506 pp.
  3. Bailey, 1998, Effects of thinning on structural development in 40- to 100-year-old Douglas-fir stands in western Oregon, For. Ecol. Manage., 108, 99, 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00216-3 · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(98)00216-3
  4. Ball, 1995, Experience with mixed and single species plantations, Common For. Rev., 74, 301
  5. Barbour, 1997, Simulated stand characteristics and wood product yields from Douglas-fir plantations managed for ecosystem objectives, For. Ecol. Manage., 91, 205, 10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03873-X · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(96)03873-x
  6. Bibby, 1989, Effects of broad-leaved trees on birds of upland conifer plantations in north Wales, Biol. Conserv., 49, 17, 10.1016/0006-3207(89)90110-9 · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(89)90110-9
  7. Binkley, D., 1992. Mixtures of nitrogen-fixing and non-nitrogen-fixing tree species. In: Cannell, M.G.R., Malcolm, D.C., Robertson, P.A. (Eds.), The Ecology of Mixed-species Stands of Trees. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 99–123.
  8. Birch, 1992, Stand-level wood-production costs of leaving live, mature trees at regeneration harvest in coastal Douglas-fir stands, West. J. Appl. For., 3, 65, 10.1093/wjaf/7.3.65 · doi:10.1093/wjaf/7.3.65
  9. Bowen, G.D., Nambiar, E.K.S., 1984. Nutrition of Plantation Forests. Academic Press, New York, 516 pp.
  10. Bower, 1968, Understory removal improves short-leaf pine growth, J. For., 66, 421
  11. Bragança, 1998, Environmental heterogeneity as a strategy for pest management in Eucalyptus plantations, For. Ecol. Manage., 102, 9, 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00115-1 · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00115-1
  12. Burkhart, H.E., Tham, Å., 1992. Predictions from growth and yield models of the performance of mixed-species stands. In: Cannell, M.G.R., Malcolm, D.C., Robertson, P.A. (Eds.), The Ecology of Mixed-species Stands of Trees. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 21–34.
  13. Butterfield, J., Malvido, J.B., 1992. Effect of mixed-species tree planting on the distribution of soil invertebrates. In: Cannell, M.G.R., Malcolm, D.C., Robertson, P.A. (Eds.), The Ecology of Mixed-species Stands of Trees. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 255–265.
  14. Carey, 1995, Small mammals in managed, naturally young- and old-growth forests, Ecol. Appl., 5, 336, 10.2307/1942026 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Cannell, M.G.R., Malcolm, D.C., Robertson, P.A., 1992. The Ecology of Mixed-species Stands of Trees. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 312 pp.
  16. Carlson, 1986, A comparison of birds inhabiting pine plantation and indigenous forest patches in a tropical mountain area, Biol. Conserv., 35, 195, 10.1016/0006-3207(86)90063-7 · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(86)90063-7
  17. Chey, 1997, Diversity of moths in forest plantations and natural forests in Sabah, Bull. Ent. Res., 87, 371, 10.1017/S000748530003738X · doi:10.1017/s000748530003738x
  18. Clout, 1984, Improving exotic forests for native birds, New Zealand J. For., 29, 193
  19. Currie, 1982, The value to bird-life of retaining small conifer stands beyond normal felling age within forests, Q. J. For., 76, 153
  20. deMaynadier, 1995, The relationship between forest management and amphibian ecology: a review of the north American literature, Environ. Rev., 3, 230, 10.1139/a95-012 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Dı́az, 1998, Breeding bird communities in pine plantations of the Spanish plateaux: biogeography, landscape and vegetation effects, J. Appl. Ecol., 35, 562, 10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.3540562.x · DOI
  22. Donald, 1997, Winter bird communities in forest plantations in western England and their response to vegetation, growth stage and grazing, Bird Study, 44, 206, 10.1080/00063659709461056 · doi:10.1080/00063659709461056
  23. Donald, 1998, Effects of forest management and grazing on breeding bird communities in plantations with broad-leaved and coniferous trees in western England, Biol. Conserv., 85, 183, 10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00114-6 · DOI
  24. Estades, 1999, Deciduous-forest bird communities in a fragmented landscape dominated by exotic pine plantations, Ecol. Appl., 9, 573, 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0573:DFBCIA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Evans, J., 1982. Plantation forestry in the tropics. Oxford University Press, New York, 472 pp.
  26. Ferns, 1992, Managing conifer plantations for the benefit of granivorous birds and mammals, Aspects Appl. Biol., 29, 83
  27. Franklin, J.F., 1992. Scientific basis for new perspectives in forests and streams. In: Naiman, R. (Ed.), Watershed Management: Balancing Sustainability and Environmental Change. Springer, New York, pp. 5–72. · DOI
  28. Franklin, J.F., Berg, D.R., Thornburgh, D.A., Tappeiner, J.C., 1997. Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber harvesting: variable retention harvest systems. In: Kohm, K.A., Franklin, J.F. (Eds.), Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 111–139.
  29. Freedman, 1996, Biodiversity implications of changes in the quantity of dead organic matter in managed forests, Environ. Rev., 4, 238, 10.1139/a96-013 · DOI
  30. Friend, 1982, Bird populations in exotic pine plantations and indigenous eucalypt forests in Gippsland, Victoria, Emu, 82, 80, 10.1071/MU9820080 · doi:10.1071/mu9820080
  31. Fries, 1997, Silvicultural models to maintain and restore natural stand structures in Swedish boreal forests, For. Ecol. Manage., 94, 89, 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00003-0 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Frost, C.C., 1993. Four centuries of changing landscape patterns in the longleaf pine ecosystem. In: Hermann, S.M. (Ed.), The Longleaf Pine Ecosystem: Ecology, Restoration, and Management. Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference, Vol. 18, pp. 17–43.
  33. Fuller, R.J., 1995. Bird-life of Woodland and Forest. Cambridge University Press, New York, 244 pp.
  34. Gill, 1996, Fire regimes and biodiversity: the effects of fragmentation of southeastern Australian eucalypt forests by urbanisation, agriculture and pine plantations, For. Ecol. Manage., 85, 261, 10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03763-2 · DOI
  35. Gjerde, 1997, Effects on avian diversity of introducing spruce (Picea sp.) plantations in the native pine (Pinus sylvestris) forests of western Norway, Biol. Conserv., 79, 241, 10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00093-6 · DOI
  36. Greenwood, M.S., Seymour, R.S., Blumenstock, M.W., 1988. Productivity of Maine’s forests underestimated—more intensive approaches are needed. Coop. For. Res. Unit Info. Rep., Vol. 19, 6 pp.
  37. Groot, 1996, Influence of shelter on night temperatures, frost damage, and bud break of white spruce seedlings, Can. J. For. Res., 26, 1531, 10.1139/x26-172 · DOI
  38. Hansen, 1995, Alternative silvicultural regimes in the Pacific northwest: simulations of ecological and economic effects, Ecol. Appl., 5, 535, 10.2307/1941965 · doi:10.2307/1941965
  39. Harris, L.D., 1984. The Fragmented Forest: Island Biogeography Theory and the Preservation of Biotic Diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 211 pp. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Hartley, 1998, A meta-analysis of forest cover, edge effects, and artificial nest predation rates, Conserv. Biol., 12, 465, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96373.x · DOI
  41. Hughes, 1994, Towards sustainable plantation forestry, New Zealand For., 39, 16
  42. Humphrey, 1999, Relationships between insect diversity and habitat characteristics in plantation forests, For. Ecol. Manage., 113, 11, 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00413-7 · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(98)00413-7
  43. Hunter, 1996, Benchmarks for managing ecosystems: are human activities natural?, Conserv. Biol., 10, 695, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10030695.x · DOI
  44. Hunter, M.L., 1996b. Fundamentals of Conservation Biology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Cambridge, MA, 482 pp.
  45. Hunter, M.L., Calhoun, A., 1995. A triad approach to land use allocation. In: Szaro, R., Johnston, D. (Eds.), Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 447–491.
  46. Keenan, 1995, Experience with mixed-species rainforest plantations in north Queensland, Common For. Rev., 74, 315
  47. Kelty, M.J., 1992. Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed-species stands. In: Kelty, M.J. (Ed.), The Ecology and Silviculture of Mixed-species Forests. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 125–141. · DOI · Paper page
  48. Kenk, G.K., 1992. Silviculture of mixed-species stands in Germany. In: Cannell, M.G.R., Malcolm, D.C., Robertson, P.A. (Eds.), The Ecology of Mixed-species Stands of Trees. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 53–63.
  49. Kerr, G., Nixon, C.J., Matthews, R.W., 1992. Silviculture and yield of mixed-species stands: the UK experience. In: Cannell, M.G.R., Malcolm, D.C., Robertson, P.A. (Eds.), The Ecology of Mixed-species Stands of trees. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 35–52.
  50. Khanna, 1997, Comparison of growth and nutrition of young monocultures and mixed stands of Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia mearnsii, For. Ecol. Manage., 94, 105, 10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03971-0 · DOI
  51. Lambeth, 1997, Genetic diversity in managed loblolly pine forests in the southeastern United States: perspective of the private industrial forest land owner, Can. J. For. Res., 27, 409, 10.1139/x96-199 · doi:10.1139/x96-199
  52. Lautenschlager, 1993, Response of wildlife to forest herbicide applications in northern coniferous ecosystems, Can. J. For. Res., 23, 2286, 10.1139/x93-283 · doi:10.1139/x93-283
  53. Lindenmayer, D.B., Pope, M.L., Cunningham, R.B., Donnelly, C.F., Nix, H.A., 1998. Conserving biodiversity in intensively-managed exotic softwood plantations in Australia: preliminary results from a landscape-scale fragmentation experiment, Abstract. In: Gustafsson, L., Weslien, J.O., Palmer, C.H., Sennerby-Forsse, L. (Eds.), Biodiversity in Managed Forests—Concepts and Solutions, Sweden 1997. Report 1/98. The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden, Uppsala.
  54. Locasio, 1990, Influence of mechanical site-preparation on deer forage in the Georgia Piedmont, South. J. Appl. For., 14, 77, 10.1093/sjaf/14.2.77 · doi:10.1093/sjaf/14.2.77
  55. López, 1997, Birds of Aleppo pine plantations in southeast Spain in relation to vegetation composition and structure, J. Appl. Ecol., 34, 1257, 10.2307/2405236 · DOI
  56. Lugo, 1997, The apparent paradox of re-establishing species richness on degraded lands with tree monocultures, For. Ecol. Manage., 99, 9, 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00191-6 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Marsden, 1996, The effect of humidity on photosynthesis and water relations of white spruce seedlings during the early establishment phase, Can. J. For. Res., 26, 1015, 10.1139/x26-112 · doi:10.1139/x26-112
  58. Matthews, J.D., 1989. Silvicultural Systems. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 284 pp.
  59. McColl, J.G., Powers, R.F., 1984. Consequences of forest management on soil–tree relationships. In: Bowen, G.D., Nambiar, E.K.S. (Eds.), Nutrition of Plantation Forests. Academic Press, New York, pp. 379–412.
  60. McConville, D.J., 1998. Overstory canopy influences on height development of red spruce and balsam-fir saplings. Unpublished M.S. Thesis. University of Maine, Orono, ME, 59 pp.
  61. Menalled, 1998, Canopy development in tropical tree plantations: a comparison of species mixtures and monocultures, For. Ecol. Manage., 104, 249, 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00255-7 · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00255-7
  62. Michelsen, 1996, Comparisons of understorey vegetation and soil fertility in plantations and adjacent natural forests in the Ethiopian highlands, J. Appl. Ecol., 33, 627, 10.2307/2404991 · DOI
  63. Montagnini, 1995, Mixed and pure forest plantations in the humid neotropics: a comparison of early growth, pest damage and establishment costs, Common For. Rev., 74, 306
  64. Moore, S.E., H.L. Allen, 1999. Plantation forestry. In: Hunter, M.L. Jr. (Ed.), Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 400–433. · DOI
  65. Morgan, J.L., Campbell, J.M., Malcolm, D.C., 1992. Nitrogen relations of mixed-species stands on oligotrophic soils. In: Cannell, M.G.R., Malcolm, D.C., Robertson, P.A. (Eds.), The Ecology of Mixed-species Stands of Trees. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 65–85.
  66. Morrison, 1984, Response of avian communities to herbicide-induced vegetation changes, J. Wildlife Manage., 48, 14, 10.2307/3808449 · doi:10.2307/3808449
  67. Moss, 1979, The effects on song-bird populations of upland afforestation with spruce, Forestry, 52, 129, 10.1093/forestry/52.2.129 · doi:10.1093/forestry/52.2.129
  68. Nambiar, E.K.S., 1984. Plantation forests: their scope and a perspective on plantation nutrition. In: Bowen, G.D., Nambiar, E.K.S. (Eds.), Nutrition of Plantation Forests. Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–15.
  69. Needham, 1999, Effects of mixed stand management to reduce impacts of spruce budworm defoliation on balsam-fir stand-level growth and yield., North. J. Appl. For., 16, 19, 10.1093/njaf/16.1.19 · doi:10.1093/njaf/16.1.19
  70. Norton, 1998, Indigenous biodiversity conservation and plantation forestry: options for the future, New Zealand For., 43, 34
  71. O’Loughlin, 1995, The sustainability paradox—an examination of the plantation effect—a review of the environmental effects of plantation forestry in New Zealand, New Zealand For., 39, 3
  72. Palik, B., Engstrom, R.T., 1999. Species composition. In: Hunter, M.L. Jr. (Ed.), Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 65–94. · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613029.005
  73. Parker, 1994, Bird communities breeding in selected spruce and pine plantations in New Brunswick, Can. Field-Nat., 108, 1, 10.5962/p.356708 · doi:10.5962/p.356708
  74. Perkins, 1998, Long-term persistence of DDT in shrews, Soricidae, from Maine, Can. Field-Nat., 112, 393, 10.5962/p.358441 · doi:10.5962/p.358441
  75. Perley, 1994, Biodiversity, sustainability and a land ethic, New Zealand For., 39, 2
  76. Perry, D.A., Bell, T., Amaranthus, M.P., 1992. Mycorrhizal fungi in mixed-species forests and other tales of positive feedback, redundancy and stability. In: Cannell, M.G.R., Malcolm, D.C., Robertson, P.A. (Eds.), The Ecology of Mixed-species Stands of Trees. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 151–179.
  77. Peterken, 1992, Old-growth conservation within British upland conifer plantations, Forestry, 65, 127, 10.1093/forestry/65.2.127 · DOI
  78. Potton, 1994, A public perception of plantation forestry, New Zealand For., 39, 2
  79. Richardson, 1994, Economics and ethics: approaches to sustainable forest management, New Zealand For., 39, 17
  80. Risch, 1981, Insect herbivore abundance in tropical monocultures and polycultures: an experimental test of two hypotheses, Ecology, 6, 85
  81. Santillo, 1989, Response of song-birds to glyphosate-induced habitat changes on clear-cuts, J. Wildlife Manage., 53, 64, 10.2307/3801307 · DOI
  82. Santillo, 1989, Response of small mammals and habitat to glyphosate application on clear-cuts, J. Wildlife Manage., 53, 164, 10.2307/3801324 · DOI
  83. Schieck, 2000, Bird communities are affected by amount and dispersion of vegetation retained in mixedwood boreal forest harvest areas, For. Ecol. Manage., 126, 239, 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00088-2 · DOI
  84. Sedjo, R.A., Botkin, D., 1997. Using forest plantations to spare natural forests. Environment 39 (10), 14–20, 30. · DOI · Paper page
  85. Smith, D.M., 1986. The Practice of Silviculture. Wiley, New York, 527 pp.
  86. Smith, F.W., Long, J.N., 1992. A comparison of stemwood production in monocultures and mixtures of Pinus contorta var. latifolia and Abies lasiocarpa. In: Cannell, M.G.R., Malcolm, D.C., Robertson, P.A. (Eds.), The Ecology of Mixed-species Stands of Trees. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 87–98.
  87. Spellerberg, 1995, Multiple-use, biological diversity and standards, New Zealand For., 39, 21
  88. Staines, B.W., 1983. The conservation and management of mammals in commercial plantations with special reference to the uplands. In: Harris, E.H.M. (Ed.), Forestry and Conservation. Royal Forestry Society, pp. 38–51.
  89. Stanley, 1999, Biomass and nutrient accumulation in pure and mixed plantations of indigenous tree species grown on poor soils in the humid tropics of Costa Rica, For. Ecol. Manage., 113, 91, 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00417-4 · DOI
  90. Stiell, 1985, Limiting white pine weevil attacks by side shade, For. Chron., 61, 5, 10.5558/tfc61005-1 · doi:10.5558/tfc61005-1
  91. Stokland, J., 1998. Managed and unmanaged coniferous forests: differences in coarse woody debris and the diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi, Abstract. In: Gustafsson, L., Weslien, J.O., Palmer, C.H., Sennerby-Forsse, L (Eds.), Biodiversity in Managed Forests—Concepts and Solutions, Sweden 1997. Report 1/98. The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden, Uppsala.
  92. Tucker, 1998, Managing mid-rotation pine plantations to enhance Bachman’s sparrow habitat, Wildlife Soc., Bull., 26, 342
  93. Vera, 1994, Effects of paper mill sludge in spruce-fir forests on wildlife in Maine, J. Wildlife Manage., 58, 719, 10.2307/3809686 · DOI
  94. Wagner, 1993, Research directions to advance forest vegetation management in north America, Can. J. For. Res., 23, 2317, 10.1139/x93-286 · doi:10.1139/x93-286
  95. Wagner, 1998, Acceptable practices in Ontario’s forests: differences between the public and forestry professionals, New For., 16, 139, 10.1023/A:1006577019706 · DOI
  96. Watt, A.D., 1992. Insect pest population dynamics: effects of tree species diversity. In: Cannell, M.G.R., Malcolm, D.C., Robertson, P.A. (Eds.), The Ecology of Mixed-species Stands of Trees. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 267–275.
  97. Wigley, 1997, Landscape-level effects of forest management on faunal diversity in bottomland hardwoods, For. Ecol. Manage., 90, 141, 10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03908-4 · DOI
  98. Wilson, 1999, Response of brown-headed nuthatches to thinning of pine plantations, Wilson Bull., 111, 56
  99. World Resources Institute, 1998. World Resources 1998–1999. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 369 pp.
  100. Zanuncio, 1998, Influence of strips of vegetation on Lepidoptera associated with Eucalyptus cloeziana in Brazil, For. Ecol. Manage., 108, 85, 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00215-1 · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(98)00215-1

Cited by

See all 717

Metadata

Authors
Hartley, M. J.
Venue
Forest Ecology and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
155
Issue
1-3
Pages
81-95
ISSN
0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00549-7
OpenAlex
W2044084913
Cited by
717
References
1
FWCI
13.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00549-7
The paper
Hartley, M. J. (2002). Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. Forest Ecology and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00549-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.