The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“since the teaching of metadiscourse markers in writing classes enables students to signal their communicative intentions effectively, highlight their authorial stances and thus influence how readers engage with the text (Hyland, 1998(Hyland, , 2005)).”
From Investigating the impact of explicit and implicit instruction on the use of interactional metadiscourse markers (2022) · cites this paper as Hyland, 1998
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Barton, 1995, Contrastive and non-contrastive connectives, Written Communication, 12, 219, 10.1177/0741088395012002003 · DOI
- Bazerman, 1985, Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema, Written Communication, 2, 3, 10.1177/0741088385002001001 · DOI · Paper page
- Beauvais, 1989, A speech-act theory of metadiscourse, Written Communication, 61, 11, 10.1177/0741088389006001002 · DOI
- Berkenkotter, 1993, Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective, Written Communication, 10, 475, 10.1177/0741088393010004001 · DOI
- Bhatia, Vijay, in press. The power and politics of genre. To appear in World Englishes 17(3).
- Biglan, 1973, The characteristics of subject matter in different scientific areas, Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 204, 10.1037/h0034699 · DOI
- Campbell, 1975, The personae of scientific discourse, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 391, 10.1080/00335637509383302 · DOI
- Cheng, 1996, Metadiscourse: A technique for improving student writing, Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 149, 10.58680/rte199615322 · DOI
- Crismore, 1989, Mr. Darwin and his readers: Exploring interpersonal metadiscourse as a dimension of ethos, Rhetoric Review, 8, 91, 10.1080/07350198909388880 · DOI
- Crismore, 1988, Readers' learning from prose: The effects of hedges, Written Communication, 5, 184, 10.1177/0741088388005002004 · DOI
- Crismore, 1993, Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students, Written Communication, 10, 39, 10.1177/0741088393010001002 · DOI
- Harris, 1991, Rhetoric of science, College English, 53, 282, 10.2307/378102 · DOI
- Holmes, 1988, Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks, Applied Linguistics, 91, 20
- Hyland, 1996, Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles, Written Communication, 13, 251, 10.1177/0741088396013002004 · DOI
- Hyland, 1997, Scientific claims and community values: Articulating an academic culture, Language and Communication, 16, 19, 10.1016/S0271-5309(96)00023-7 · DOI
- Hyland, Ken, in press a. Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the Chairman's letter. To appear in Journal of Business Communication.
- Hyland, Ken, in press b. Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory textbooks. To appear in English for Specific Purposes.
- Intaraprawat, 1995, The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL essays, Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 253, 10.1016/1060-3743(95)90012-8 · DOI
- Mauranen, 1993, Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts, English for Specific Purposes, 12, 3, 10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-I · DOI
- Myers, 1989, The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles, Applied Linguistics, 10, 1, 10.1093/applin/10.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Schiffrin, 1980, Metatalk: Organisational and evaluative brackets in discourse, Sociological Inquiry, 50, 199, 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00021.x · DOI
- Swales, 1993, Genre and engagement, Revue Belge de Philologie et Histoire, 71, 689
- Thomas, 1994, Reporting verbs in medical journal articles, English for Specific Purposes, 13, 129, 10.1016/0889-4906(94)90012-4 · DOI
- Valero-Garces, 1996, Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Spanish-English Economics texts, English for Specific Purposes, 15, 279, 10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00013-0 · DOI
- Vande Kopple, 1985, Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse, College Composition and Communication, 36, 82, 10.2307/357609 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hooking the reader: a corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002 · Cited by 404
Self-citationBringing in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Articles
HYLAND, K. (2001) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088301018004005 · Cited by 375
Self-citationEl-Dakhs, D. A. S., Yahya, N., & Pawlak, M. (2022) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-022-00175-0 · Cited by 13
Zhang, M., & Zhang, J. (2026) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amaf032 · Cited by 7
Sadigzade, Z. (2026) · Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum · doi:10.69760/aghel.026001005 · Cited by 1
“We compared patterns in AI vs. human texts, guided by principles from discourse pragmatics (Hyland, 1998; Camiciottoli, 2004) and stancetaking (Hyland & Jiang, 2016).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Hyland, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Pragmatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 437-455
- ISSN
- 0378-2166
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review