The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Only the tip of the iceberg: Who understands what about metaphor?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Below the "tip of the iceberg" lies the unknown, assumed and unevaluated risks.
“Below the “tip of the iceberg” (a metaphor) [167] lies the unknown, assumed and unevaluated risks [168].”
From What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours (2020) · cites this paper as [167]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Blasko, Dawn G. and Deborah S. Briihl, in press. The reading and recall of metaphorical sentences: Effects of familiarity and context. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity. · DOI
- Blasko, 1993, Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 295, 10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.295 · DOI
- Daneman, 1980, Individual differences in working memory and reading, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450, 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Glucksberg, 1993, Conceptual metaphors are not automatically accessed during idioms comprehension, Memory and Cognition, 21, 711, 10.3758/BF03197201 · DOI
- Glucksberg, 1982, On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors?, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 85, 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90467-4 · DOI
- Glucksberg, 1990, Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity, Psychological Review, 97, 3, 10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3 · DOI
- Inhoff, 1984, Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in reading, Memory and Cognition, 12, 558, 10.3758/BF03213344 · DOI
- Janus, 1985, Processing of metaphoric language: An investigation of the three-stage model of metaphor comprehension, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 14, 473, 10.1007/BF01666722 · DOI
- Johnson, 1989, Developmental levels of processing in metaphor interpretation, Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 1
- Johnson, 1993, Relation of cognitive style to metaphor interpretation and second language proficiency, Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 159, 10.1017/S014271640000953X · DOI
- Just, 1992, A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory, Psychological Review, 99, 122, 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122 · DOI · Paper page
- Katz, 1988, Norms for 204 literary and 260 nonliterary metaphors on 10 psychological dimensions, Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 3, 191, 10.1207/s15327868ms0304_1 · DOI
- Kemper, 1989, Priming the comprehension of metaphors, Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 4, 1, 10.1207/s15327868ms0401_1 · DOI
- Ortony, 1978, Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 465, 10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90283-9 · DOI
- Trick, 1986, The domain interaction approach to metaphor processing: Relating individual differences and metaphor characteristics, Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1, 185, 10.1207/s15327868ms0103_3 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alonso-Fernández, M., López-López, A., Losada, A., González, J. L., & Wetherell, J. L. (2016) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/pme.12885 · Cited by 73
Chapman, M., Thomas, M., & Thompson, K. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122222 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Blasko, D. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Pragmatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1675-1683
- ISSN
- 0378-2166
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
