Cited by 894

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Commercial bank net interest margins, default risk, interest-rate risk, and off-balance sheet banking

Angbazo, Lazarus·1997·Journal of Banking & Finance

DOI 10.1016/s0378-4266(96)00025-8

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0378-4266(96)00025-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring
Diamond, D. W. (1984) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297430 · Cited by 8,476
Some evidence on the empirical significance of credit rationing
Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1992) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261851 · Cited by 550 · cited 1×
“…suggest that credit contraction in bank lending may influence the net interest margins because of loan rate stickiness caused by credit rationing (Berger and Udell, 1992), because of deposit rate rigidities caused 1 See Flannery and James (1984), Aharony et al. (1988), Sweeney and Warga (1986),…”
Background

Authors: Angbazo, L.
Venue: Journal of Banking & Finance
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 1997-01
Volume: 21
Issue: 1
Pages: 55-87
ISSN: 0378-4266 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4266(96)00025-8
OpenAlex: W2059812431
Cited by: 894
References: 2
FWCI: 7.27
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review