The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why are bank profits so persistent? The roles of product market competition, informational opacity, and regional/macroeconomic shocks
Abstract
We investigate how banking market competition, informational opacity, and sensitivity to shocks have changed over the last three decades by examining the persistence of firm-level rents. We develop propagation mechanisms with testable implications to isolate the sources of persistence. Our analysis suggests that different processes underlie persistent performance at the high and low ends of the distribution. Our tests suggest that impediments to competition and informational opacity continue to be strong determinants of performance; that the reduction in geographic regulatory restrictions had little effect on competitiveness; and that performance remains sensitive to regional/macroeconomic shocks. The findings also suggest reasons for the recent record profitability of the industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
Carhart, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x · Cited by 17,283
Survivorship Bias in Performance Studies
Brown, S. J., Goetzmann, W., Ibbotson, R. G., & Ross, S. A. (1992) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/5.4.553 · Cited by 1,121
Cited by
Banking Market Structure, Financial Dependence and Growth: International Evidence from Industry Data
Cetorelli, N., & Gambera, M. (2001) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00339 · Cited by 788
Metadata
- Authors
- Berger, A. N., Bonime, S. D., Covitz, D. M., & Hancock, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Banking & Finance
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1203-1235
- ISSN
- 0378-4266 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165511241
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
