The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonextensive statistical mechanics and economics
Open accessAbstract
Ergodicity, this is to say, dynamics whose time averages coincide with ensemble averages, naturally leads to Boltzmann–Gibbs (BG) statistical mechanics, hence to standard thermodynamics. This formalism has been at the basis of an enormous success in describing, among others, the particular stationary state corresponding to thermal equilibrium. There are, however, vast classes of complex systems which accommodate quite badly, or even not at all, within the BG formalism. Such dynamical systems exhibit, in one way or another, nonergodic aspects. In order to be able to theoretically study at least some of these systems, a formalism was proposed 14 years ago, which is sometimes referred to as nonextensive statistical mechanics. We briefly introduce this formalism, its foundations and applications. Furthermore, we provide some bridging to important economical phenomena, such as option pricing, return and volume distributions observed in the financial markets, and the fascinating and ubiquitous concept of risk aversion. One may summarize the whole approach by saying that BG statistical mechanics is based on the entropy SBG=−k∑ipilnpi, and typically provides exponential laws for describing stationary states and basic time-dependent phenomena, while nonextensive statistical mechanics is instead based on the entropic form Sq=k(1−∑ipiq)/(q−1) (with S1=SBG), and typically provides, for the same type of description, (asymptotic) power laws.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics
Tsallis, C. (1988) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01016429 · Cited by 9,589
Self-citation
Cited by
Physical approach to complex systems
Kwapień, J., & Drożdż, S. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.007 · Cited by 517
Abramov, D. M., Quintanilha, D. D. F., Lima, H. S., Costa, R. P., Kamil-Leite, C., Lazarev, V. V., & Tsallis, C. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-21156-6 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsallis, C., Anteneodo, C., Borland, L., & Osorio, R.
- Venue
- Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 324
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 89-100
- ISSN
- 0378-4371 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008597091
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonextensive statistical mechanics and economics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0378-4371(03)00042-6
- The paper
- Tsallis, C., Anteneodo, C., Borland, L., & Osorio, R. (2003). Nonextensive statistical mechanics and economics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4371(03)00042-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.